Lisa J. Storrie-Lombardi,1 Bolinda E. Kahr,1 Joseph C. Hunt,1 Sean Careyhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0221-6871,2,3 Carson Lee Bennett,2,3 Nancy Silbermann,2,3 Elena Scire,2,3 William A. Mahoney,2,3 Patrick Lowrance2,3
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The Spitzer Space Telescope is executing the ninth year of extended operations beyond its 5.5-year prime mission. The project anticipated a maximum extended mission of about four years when the first mission extension was proposed. The robustness of the observatory hardware and the creativity of the project engineers and scientists in overcoming hurdles to operations has enabled a substantially longer mission lifetime. This has led to more challenges with an aging groundsystem due to resource reductions and decisions made early in the extended mission based on a shorter planned lifetime. We provide an overview of the extended mission phases, challenges met in maintaining and enhancing the science productivity, and what we would have done differently if the extended mission was planned from the start to be nearly twice as long as the prime mission.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.
The alert did not successfully save. Please try again later.
Lisa J. Storrie-Lombardi, Bolinda E. Kahr, Joseph C. Hunt, Sean Carey, Carson Lee Bennett, Nancy Silbermann, Elena Scire, William A. Mahoney, Patrick Lowrance, "Lessons learned in extended-extended Spitzer Space Telescope operations," Proc. SPIE 10704, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems VII, 107041D (10 July 2018); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2314116