|
1.INTRODUCTIONIt is a well-known fact that the study of the Special Theory of Relativity (STR) and its corresponding relativistic effects are theoretically important but also very challenging to understand, especially for undergraduate students.1-3 The STR is also less emphasized in schools due to limited class time and the growing list of newer and competing fields of study such as Optics, Photonics, Electronics, and others. Furthermore, for researchers, the work on STR is experimentally difficult to implement since they often necessitate outer-space environments and conditions that are costly and extremely troublesome to replicate in traditional laboratories (e.g., very fast velocity, the presence of strong gravity, cosmic radiation, extreme temperatures, and vacuum).4 Moreover, bulky, sophisticated, and costly instruments are typically required for such endeavors. Thus, a challenge for scientists and physics education researchers is to conceive and develop novel analogue implementation platforms through which STR and its relativistic effects and/or concepts can be studied easily using available and common technological platforms. In recent years, we have been researching three main relativistic effects – namely the (a) Relativistic Aberration of Light (RAL), 4,5 (b) Thomas Rotation Effect (TRE),6-7 and (c) Einstein’s Velocity Addition (EVA).8 A unique aspect of our research approach is that we employ different implementation schemes to mimic a specific behavior or property of any of the three aforementioned relativistic effects. In particular, we have developed relativistic analogues based on low-cost and simple technological platforms in our previous works.4-8 Note that a relativistic analogue is simply an analogue that is capable of mimicking a relativistic effect. Our relativistic analogues have the potential to improve research efforts in the field of the STR and supplement the current pedagogical approaches used in STEM education – most notably in physics education. This is due to the ease at which they can be fabricated and how accurately they can mimic a specific behavior or property of a relativistic effect, which aids both students and researchers in studying the STR along with its concepts and relativistic effects. Although it is straightforward to incorporate these analogues in education and research applications, there is an ongoing challenge to develop a coherent framework to (a) discuss these relativistic analogues from different perspectives, and (b) demonstrate the rich linkages of the different fields (ex. Optic, Photonics, Electronics) to each other through this unique analogue approach. Thus, our goal in this paper is to propose and present a coherent educational and research framework that we refer to as Concept Connectivity to accomplish the following objectives: (i) to tie together all the different concepts, (b) to couple these concepts to engineering skills needed to conceive and develop real-world platform(s), and (c) to report the different implementation approaches we described previously. We note that Concept Connectivity links the different principles in Optics, Photonics, and Electronics to explain the concepts from the STR, which aids in educating students holistically on the field of Physics, Optics, Photonics, and Electronics which are normally studied separately within a typical undergraduate Physics or Applied Physics program. It also increases students’ engagement by presenting the study of Physics through the STR in a coherent and unified manner. Thus, Concept Connectivity has two major benefits in (a) Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, and (b) research. Here, we discuss what it can offer in STEM education with an emphasis on optics, photonics, and electronics education. We also outline its potential benefits in research as a conceptual scientific tool. 2.CONCEPT CONNECTIVITY: NOVEL FRAMEWORK FOR EDUCATION AND RESEARCHConcept Connectivity is concerned with finding two or more similarities between a concept/phenomenon from the STR with different fields of study as shown in Fig. 1(a). It shows that a particular concept in the STR can be mimicked by four different fields: Optics, Photonics, Electronics and Digital Signal Processing (DSP). We also note that these four fields can be related to one another through what we refer to as the analogue approach, which makes use of analogue implementation platforms to connect two concepts or phenomena. Thus, the more linkages that we can conceive for the same concept or effect, the richer the knowledge obtained by the researchers or students. More importantly, as a consequence, the linkages from other fields can also be related analogously to each other to obtain richer and more generic interconnections. Figure 1.The principle of (a) Concept Connectivity (CC) requires that we link one STR concept with at least two or more concepts from different fields such as Optics, Photonics, Electronics, Digital Signal Processing (DSP), etc., and (b) the operational procedure of CC consisting of 3 actions. ![]() Operationally speaking, Concept Connectivity consists of three main activities as outlined in Fig. 1(b):
2.1Mathematical analogyThe first activity of Concept Connectivity begins with the search and recognition of mathematical analogies. To elaborate, there often exists “mathematical similarities” between distinct physical concepts. These mathematical similarities are concretized in the form of analogies, which are conceptual tools that are commonly used in STEM education to help students learn unfamiliar knowledge, concepts, or phenomena by relating them to existing ones that the individuals have had prior experience with.9 Generally speaking, analogies are well-known and effective tools for teaching science-related topics as they improve a student’s comprehension and retention of abstract concepts. For this reason, analogies—specifically mathematical analogies—have played an important role in our previous works on relativistic analogues.4-8 As an example, we have previously reported the similarity between the equations of (i) the direction angle of Relativistic Aberration of Light (RAL) from the STR and (ii) the phase response of a microring resonator (MRR) implemented with an All-Pass Filter (APF) configuration as shown in Fig. 2(c).5 Note that we refer to the latter as the RAL-APF for simplicity. Summarily speaking, we note that both equations shown in Fig. 2 use the expression 2 · tan−1(X), and it is a simple matter of equating both expressions such that that θ = τ1. Figure 2.(a) Example of Concept Connectivity where the equations of RAL of STR and MRR-based APF are mathematically the same, (b) the physical representation of RAL, (c) the physical implementation of MRR-based APF circuit (c), and (d) the full circuit of RAL in STR is implemented with Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI)-assisted RAL-APF. ![]() 2.2Physical or Engineering AdjustmentIn our previous example concerning the RAL-APF, we note that since the relationship between the quantities 𝚽 and 𝚿RAL-APF are exact, they can be simulated immediately. Although the direction angle 𝚿RAL-APF of the RAL can be measured physically, it must be noted that the output phase response 𝚽 of the RAL-APF cannot be measured directly. Thus, there is a need for the second procedure, which we call the “physical or engineering adjustment”. This challenges researcher/students to use their engineering knowledge and skills to think of an “engineering scheme” that must be implemented to obtain the measured quantity indirectly. It must be noted that all our relativistic analogues are mostly based on the same key technology– the all-pass filter (APF) element which can be implemented in many different platforms. In bulk optical platforms, this can be generated by a Thin Film-based Gires-Tournois Interferometer (GTI). In a photonic platform, this can be implemented with microring resonator (MRR)-based photonic integrated circuits (PIC). In an electronic platform, this can be obtained using an operational amplifier (OP-Amp) based electronic integrated circuits (EIC). Despite their exact mathematical similarities, the physical or operational actions are not exact since the output phase response of the MRR and GTI cannot be measured directly. Hence, we need to perform the “Physical and engineering adjustment scheme”. 2.3Platform Selection and Technological Implementation PlatformsThe next step is the selection of an appropriate implementation platform and its corresponding physical or engineering adjustment scheme to physically represent the said analogy. We refer to this implementation platform as an analogue, which refers to any technological device or system that can mimic the behaviors and properties of a concept or phenomenon. As mentioned previously, we have developed different relativistic analogues to study the following relativistic effects in our earlier works: the (i) RAL, (ii) TRA (or Thomas Angle), and (iii) EVA.4-8 The challenge to researchers/students is to use their engineering knowledge and skills to conceive of an engineering scheme for “Phase-to-Intensity conversion for the optics and photonics platform cases” that must be implemented to obtain the measured quantity indirectly. In the case of the photonic platform, the “engineering adjustment” can be accomplished by incorporating the RAL-APF circuit into one of the arms of a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer (MZI) as shown Fig. 2(d) and Fig. 3(a). We refer to this implementation as the MZI-assisted RAL-APF or MZI-RAL-APF. Thus, it is possible to experimentally verify the behavior of the RAL through the implementation of MZI-RAL-APF. In the case of bulk optics, this can be accomplished with the use of a Michelson Interferometer (MI) as shown in Fig. 3(a). The diagrams of the resultant relativistic analogues are shown in Fig. 3(a-c) for different platforms. 2.4Growing list of relativistic analoguesOne small caveat in the previous activity on developing an analogy between two distinct concepts is that students or researchers must initially be familiar with both concepts, as the effectiveness of the resulting analogy is dependent on the depth of their knowledge of both concepts and their underlying principles. It is also worth noting that an analogy between two distinct concepts cannot always be readily translated into a corresponding analogue, especially if both concepts are theoretical in nature. Moreover, the more complex the analogy, then the greater the specifications required for the analogue or implementation platform will be. Thus, the goal of the researcher is to find an existing analogue (e.g., device, system, etc.) that can serve as the physical manifestation of an established analogy. In our previous works, we have reported various relativistic analogues for a particular relativistic effect, which are all summarized in Table 1. Table 1.Summary of relativistic analogues using Photonics, Optics and Electronics platforms.
3.PEDAGOGICAL BENEFITS OF CONCEPT CONNECTIVITY IN STEM EDUCATIONConcept Connectivity has the following benefits for STEM education: firstly, as an educational framework it promotes a structured and integrated approach to “analogous learning”, where students are encouraged to find a connection (i.e., similarities) between seemingly unrelated concepts in the form of an analogy. This fosters creative thinking among the students and allows them to see how different disciplines or fields of study such as physics and electronics are connected. Secondly, Concept Connectivity helps develop basic and practical knowledge among students through the use of implementation platforms or analogues that can manifest the established analogy between two concepts. Lastly, our proposed framework will help expose students to the myriad of applications related to analogues. 3.1Concept Connectivity as a teaching tool for multi-disciplinary topicsAs can be seen in Table 1, these analogues are implemented with any one of the three technological platforms – namely: (i) photonic integrated circuits (PICs) using microring resonator (MRR) waveguide as the primary element, (ii) free-space optic using the thin-film (TF)-based mirror as the key element, and (iii) electronics using the operational amplifier (OP-AMP)-based phase shifter as the core element. In principle, these three key elements can mimic the function of a mathematical entity called an all-pass filter (APF) as mentioned earlier. Again, it brings together the different fields of Optics, Photonics, and Electronics. More importantly, we can use their interrelationship to link these field to one another. In STEM education, this exercise is especially significant on three fronts. First, students can understand and establish the unlikely “concept connection” between two distinct phenomena, namely the (i) RAL—a relativistic phenomenon that is highly abstract in nature, and (ii) the RAL-APF circuit—a physical object. Second, although students mentally know that there is a link, with this proposed framework, they are also exposed to a direct example of emerging engineering fields like PICs. Clearly, students can easily recognize the clear link between the (i) science of RAL in the STR with (ii) the engineering field of PICs. Third, students can be challenged to apply their engineering skills to resolve how to demonstrate this concept (for example: how to come up with or design a phase-to-intensity conversion scheme with the use of MZI-assisted RAL-APF). In short, we formed a new bridge between the fields of photonics in engineering and the STR in physics, which opens the door to many new and exciting applications. 3.2Pedagogical benefits of Concept Connectivity in optics and photonics educationConcept Connectivity has direct benefits for optics and photonics education. In particular, since most of our relativistic analogues are based on optical and photonic technologies, both physics and engineering students are exposed to devices such as microring resonators, all-pass filter (APF) circuits, and photonic integrated circuits. To understand their connection to their intended relativistic effect, students are tasked to first familiarize themselves with the very basics of optics and photonics (e.g., the nature and properties of light). Once this is accomplished, they are required to undergo practical training in the operation of the aforementioned devices. Thus, through Concept Connectivity, students not only learn about the STR in physics and its relativistic effects, but they also acquire knowledge and experience in optics and photonics as well, which broadens their skills and critical thinking. 3.3Electronic Platform as Low-Cost Issue implementation platform and its impact on pedagogical teachingIn the previous sections, it must be noted that most analogies we established are implemented through optical, and photonic technologies. However, the most cost-effective platform is based on electronic circuits. In our previous work,8 we reported an electronic analogue for the RAL (see Electronic Analogue I in Table 1) that we refer to as the RAL-EC, whose schematic design can easily be replicated using simple components as shown in Fig. 4a. We emphasized in our previous work that the RAL-EC could be used as a teaching tool through which students can learn about the RAL. Specifically, the RAL-EC can be used to ground the abstract and theoretical nature of the RAL into more tangible and digestible knowledge that students can easily assimilate. This could be accomplished by first showing how the RAL-EC operates through a laboratory experiment. Once the students are familiar with this device, the instructor can then establish the mathematical analogy between it and the RAL for the students to see how they are connected. In this manner, the student’s learning experience is reinforced as they are engaged through a more practical and “hands-on” approach, as opposed to the typical teaching approach of directly explaining what the RAL is. 4.CONCEPT CONNECTIVITY AND ITS IMPACT ON RESEARCHBriefly, another benefit of Concept Connectivity is that it can be used as a conceptual tool for research. For one, as a straightforward consequence, it has the potential to pinpoint other relativistic phenomena that have not been studied yet such as (i) Relativistic Doppler Shift, (ii) Length Contraction, and (iii) Time Dilation. It challenges researchers to devise innovative analogues for these phenomena. In particular, the use of our electronic analogue for example,8 will allow researchers to potentially study the specific behaviors and properties of the other relativistic effects aside from the RAL without complex instruments. This lowers the required costs for researchers, and it allows for ease of experimentation since our relativistic analogues are based on simple tabletop configurations that can be replicated in most laboratories at educational and research institutions. 5.CONCLUSIONIn this paper, we have presented an educational and research framework that we refer to as Concept Connectivity. In addition to introducing the five main components of this framework, we have also enumerated its potential for research and educational applications in the context of our previous works on relativistic analogues. We believe that researchers and educators can make use of Concept Connectivity to improve their research methodologies and promote quality education, especially in the fields of optics and photonics. 6.ACKNOWLEDGMENTSWe would like to acknowledge the travel support from the Ateneo ARISE, the Department of Physics, and the University Research Council (URC) of the Ateneo de Manila University. 7.7.REFERENCESAlstein, P., Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., and van Joolingen, W. R,
“Teaching and learning special relativity theory in secondary and lower undergraduate education: A literature review,”
Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res, 17
(2), 023101
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.023101 Google Scholar
Kamphorst, F., Vollebregt, M. J., Savelsbergh, E. R., and van Joolingen, W. R,
“An educational reconstruction of special relativity theory for secondary education,”
Science & Education, 32
(1), 57
–100
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00283-2 Google Scholar
Villani, A., and Arruda, S. M,
“Special theory of relativity, conceptual change and history of science,”
Science & Education, 7 85
–100
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008609018266 Google Scholar
B. Dingel, A. Buenaventura, and K. Murakawa,
“Optical Analogue of Relativistic Thomas Effect in Special Relativity using Photonic Integrated Circuits,”
Journal of Modern Optics, 65 2171
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2018.1502826 Google Scholar
B. Dingel, A. Buenaventura, A. Chua, N. Libatique, and K. Murakawa,
“Relativistic Aberration of Light Mimicked by Microring resonator (MRR)-based Optical All-Pass Filter (APF) for Special-Relativity-on-a-Chip,”
183 82
(2019). Google Scholar
B. Dingel, A. Buenaventura, A. Chua, N. Libatique,
“Toward Special-Relativity-on-a-Chip: analogue of Einstein velocity addition using optical add-drop filter (OADF),”
Journal of Modern Optics, 66 679
(2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500340.2018.1564846 Google Scholar
B. Dingel, A. Buenaventura, A. Chua, and N. Libatique,
“Thin Film-based Gires-Tournois Resonator (GTR) as Quasi-Optical Analogue of the Thomas Rotation Angle Effect in Special Relativity,”
Optics Communications, 454
(2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124510 Google Scholar
B. Dingel, K. Iris de Castro, J. L. Dagohoy, N. Libatique and C. Oppus,
“Circuit analogue of relativistic aberration of light using low-cost, low-complexity operational amplifier-based all-pass filters (APFs),”
European Journal of Physics, 42 015605
(2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/abb56b Google Scholar
Sezer, K., and Karatas, F. Ö,
“Research Trends about Analogy Studies in Science Education: A Descriptive Content Analysis,”
Journal of Science Learning, 5
(2), 217
–225
(2022). https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v5i2 Google Scholar
|