Poster + Paper
27 March 2024 Classifier to predict cardiac output through photoplethysmography waveform analysis
Joshua H. Chiu, Kimberly L. Branan, Chin-To Hsiao, Gerard L. Coté
Author Affiliations +
Conference Poster
Abstract
In this study, features were extracted from PPG waveforms and used to train different classifier models, where cardiac output (CO) was classified into three ranges: low, healthy, and high. We used a curated dataset from the PhysioNet platform, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) Matched database, which contains PPG waveforms and CO measurements. Specifically, there were 16 viable patients with over 184 hours of synchronous PPG and CO measurements. The data was then categorized into three distinct classes: Low CO (< 5 L/min), Healthy CO (5-6 L/min), and High CO (> 6 L/min). MATLAB’s Classification Learner application was used to implement and compare different classification techniques where thirty pre-configured models were compared, including SVMs, KNNs, Ensemble, Linear and Logistical Regression, and Neural Networks. From all the tested models, a Bagged Trees Ensemble model was determined to have the highest validation and testing accuracy (87.7% and 88.2%, respectively). It is noteworthy that, with our approach, there was no calibration needed and since the validation and testing accuracies were similar, this suggests that the selected model did not overfit the data.
(2024) Published by SPIE. Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Joshua H. Chiu, Kimberly L. Branan, Chin-To Hsiao, and Gerard L. Coté "Classifier to predict cardiac output through photoplethysmography waveform analysis", Proc. SPIE 12850, Optical Diagnostics and Sensing XXIV: Toward Point-of-Care Diagnostics, 128500J (27 March 2024); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3001861
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Data modeling

Neural networks

Feature extraction

Photoplethysmography

Databases

Cross validation

Machine learning

Back to Top