Paper
1 December 1991 Evaluation of interference patterns: a comparison of methods
Thomas M. Kreis, Juergen Geldmacher
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Methods for determination of the interference phase distributions from interference patterns are presented and the most important methods, which are fringe tracking, temporal heterodyning, phase shifting and Fourier transform evaluation are compared with regard to experimental requirements, achievable resolution and precision, as well as inherent noise suppression and image enhancement. The comparison shows: whenever phase shifting is possible, it is the best choice. If only one interference pattern is offered, Fourier transform evaluation is recommendable.
© (1991) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Thomas M. Kreis and Juergen Geldmacher "Evaluation of interference patterns: a comparison of methods", Proc. SPIE 1554, Second International Conference on Photomechanics and Speckle Metrology, (1 December 1991); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.57464
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 3 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Phase shifts

Fourier transforms

Heterodyning

Phase shifting

Interferometry

Holographic interferometry

Moire patterns

RELATED CONTENT

Hologram interferometry using PSALM
Proceedings of SPIE (January 01 1992)
Projection moire using PSALM
Proceedings of SPIE (December 01 1991)
Expert system for analysis of complicated fringe patterns
Proceedings of SPIE (February 05 1993)
Fringe analysis in moire interferometry
Proceedings of SPIE (December 01 1991)
Scanning projection grating moire topography
Proceedings of SPIE (March 16 2000)

Back to Top