Paper
10 December 1996 Is smaller better?--Scaling of characteristics with size of fiber-optic chemical and biochemical sensors
Raoul Kopelman, Sunil Dourado
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Micron and submicron fiber-optic chemical and biochemical sensors have been developed recently in our laboratory. Here we give a theoretical discussion, based on pragmatic modes of operation, of the advantages and disadvantages of optode miniaturization. In most instances we present explicit functional dependences of specific optode characteristics on the optode radius (r). For instance, the absolute detection limit decreases with r3 (good the response time reduces with r2 (good noise ratio decreases with r (bad our standard working conditions. Other features that improve with down-sizing include sample volume, sensitivity, invasiveness, spatial resolution, enzyme activity, heating of sensor and/or sample, toxicity and materials cost. Features that may worsen include fluorophore leaching and photodamage to sensor and/or sample. Methods for overcoming these disadvantages make use of the shorter response times of small optodes and forward optical signal collection with small samples (utilizing standard lab microscopes). We refer to the ultimate goal of non-destructive single molecule detection and imaging.
© (1996) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Raoul Kopelman and Sunil Dourado "Is smaller better?--Scaling of characteristics with size of fiber-optic chemical and biochemical sensors", Proc. SPIE 2836, Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Fiber Sensors VIII, (10 December 1996); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.260577
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 13 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Sensors

Molecules

Diffusion

Molecular lasers

Absorbance

Fiber optics sensors

Fiber optics

Back to Top