Paper
28 June 2001 Field-of-view-dependent helical pitch in multislice CT
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
A goal of multi-scale CT (MSCT) is to decrease the scan time needed to image a volume of the patient. Detectors with multiple rows of sensors enable higher helical pitches and thus shorter scan times. One of the difficulties in devising an efficient reconstruction method with good image quality and good dose utilization is that each image pixel is irradiated by the cone-beam for a different range of gantry orientations. We derive a new half-scan weighting scheme for a helical, cone-beam backprojection algorithm based on the virtual fan angle. The virtual fan angle, in turn, determines the gantry view range such that image quality is maintained by allowing only valid ray-sums while using the available dose. This restricts the virtual fan angle to be at least the true geometric fan angle but less than 180 degree(s). The result is a computational efficient and dose efficient reconstruction algorithm with a continuous range of field-of-view dependent helical pitches. A 43% higher helical pitch is possible for the smallest field-of-view compared with the largest field-of-view, using the parameters of a commercial MSCT-scanner. Dose efficiency is compared among the new method and standard half scan and full scan approaches.
© (2001) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Michael D. Silver, Katsuyuki Taguchi, and Kyung S. Han "Field-of-view-dependent helical pitch in multislice CT", Proc. SPIE 4320, Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, (28 June 2001); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.430862
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 15 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Reconstruction algorithms

Fluctuations and noise

Sensors

Image quality

Detection and tracking algorithms

Computed tomography

Detector arrays

Back to Top