Paper
14 June 2004 Phase I trial of motexafin-lutetium-mediated interstitial photodynamic therapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer
Diana C. Hsiung Stripp M.D., Rosemarie Mick, Timothy C. Zhu, Richard Whittington, Debbie Smith R.N., Andreea Dimofte, Jarod C. Finlay, Jeremy Miles, Theresa M. Busch, Daniel Shin, Alex Kachur, Zelig A. Tochner M.D., S. Bruce Malkowicz, Eli Glatstein M.D., Stephen M. Hahn
Author Affiliations +
Abstract
Therapeutic options for patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after treatment with radiation therapy are limited. An ongoing Phase I trial of interstitial photodynamic therapy (PDT) with the photosensitizer motexafin lutetium (MLu) was initiated in year 2000 for men with locally recurrent prostate cancer. The primary objective of this trial is to determine the maximally tolerated dose of motexafin lutetium-mediated PDT. Twelve men with biopsy-proven recurrent prostate cancer and no evidence of distant metastatic disease have been enrolled. Pre-treatment evaluation included an MRI of the prostate, bone scan, laboratory studies, cystoscopy, and transrectal ultrasound. Treatment plans were generated based upon the ultrasound findings. PDT dose was escalated by increasing the motexafin lutetium dose, increasing the 732 nm light dose, and decreasing the drug-light interval. Motexafin lutetium doses ranged from 0.5 to 2 mg/kg administered IV 3, 6, or 24 hours prior to 732 nm light delivery. The light dose measured in real time with in situ spherical detectors was 25-100 J/cm2 for all patients. Light was delivered through optical fibers inserted through a transperineal brachytherapy template in the operating room and optical property measurements were made before and after light therapy. Prostate biopsies were obtained before and after light delivery for spectrofluorometric measurements of photosensitizer uptake. Twelve patients have completed protocol treatment on eight dose levels without dose-limiting toxicity. Grade I PDT-related genitourinary symptoms were observed. One patient had Grade II urinary urgency that was urinary catheter-related. No rectal or other GI PDT-related toxicities were observed. Measurements of motexafin lutetium in prostate tissue demonstrated the presence of photosensitizer at all dose levels. Conclusions: Motexafin lutetium-mediated PDT designed to treat comprehensively the entired prostate gland has been well-tolerated at the doses studied to date.
© (2004) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE). Downloading of the abstract is permitted for personal use only.
Diana C. Hsiung Stripp M.D., Rosemarie Mick, Timothy C. Zhu, Richard Whittington, Debbie Smith R.N., Andreea Dimofte, Jarod C. Finlay, Jeremy Miles, Theresa M. Busch, Daniel Shin, Alex Kachur, Zelig A. Tochner M.D., S. Bruce Malkowicz, Eli Glatstein M.D., and Stephen M. Hahn "Phase I trial of motexafin-lutetium-mediated interstitial photodynamic therapy in patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer", Proc. SPIE 5315, Optical Methods for Tumor Treatment and Detection: Mechanisms and Techniques in Photodynamic Therapy XIII, (14 June 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.529181
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 22 scholarly publications.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Photodynamic therapy

Prostate

Toxicity

Prostate cancer

Tissues

Biopsy

Radiotherapy

Back to Top