How much is enough? Factors affecting the optimal interpretation of breast screening mammograms

Hazel J. Scott; Alastair G. Gale

doi:10.1117/12.708159

20 March 2007 How much is enough? Factors affecting the optimal interpretation of breast screening mammograms

Hazel J. Scott, Alastair G. Gale

Proceedings Volume 6515, Medical Imaging 2007: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment; 65150F (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.708159
Event: Medical Imaging, 2007, San Diego, CA, United States

Abstract

PERFORMS (Personal Performance in Mammographic Screening), a self-assessment scheme for film-readers is undertaken as an educational tool by mammographers reading breast-screening films in the UK. The scheme has been running as a bi-annual exercise since its inception in 1991. In addition to completing the scheme each year the majority of film-readers also choose to complete a questionnaire, administered as part of the scheme, indicating key aspects of their every-day reading practice. These key aspects include, volume of cases read per week, time-on-task reading screening films, incidence and time of break periods as well as typical number of film-reading sessions per week. Previous recommendations on best screening practice (significantly the optimum time on task) were considered in the light of these film-readers' self-reports on a current PERFORMS case set. In addition we looked at performance accuracy of over 450 film-readers reading PERFORMS cases (60 difficult mammographic cases). Performance on measures akin to True Positive (Correct Recall Percentages) and True Negative (Correct Return to Screen Percentages) decisions were investigated. Data presented demonstrate that individual behaviours in real life screening, for the interpretation of mammographic cases, affect film-reading accuracy on a test set of mammograms for specificity and sensitivity (namely volume of cases read per week and film-reading experience). The consequences for best screening practice, in real life, are considered.

Citation Download Citation

Hazel J. Scott and Alastair G. Gale "How much is enough? Factors affecting the optimal interpretation of breast screening mammograms", Proc. SPIE 6515, Medical Imaging 2007: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, 65150F (20 March 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.708159

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available