Pitch doubling through dual-patterning lithography challenges in integration and litho budgets

Mircea Dusa; John Quaedackers; Olaf F. A. Larsen; Jeroen Meessen; Eddy van der Heijden; Gerald Dicker; Onno Wismans; Paul de Haas; Koen van Ingen Schenau; Jo Finders; Bert Vleeming; Geert Storms; Patrick Jaenen; Shaunee Cheng; Mireille Maenhoudt

doi:10.1117/12.714278

27 March 2007 Pitch doubling through dual-patterning lithography challenges in integration and litho budgets

Mircea Dusa, John Quaedackers, Olaf F. A. Larsen, Jeroen Meessen, Eddy van der Heijden, Gerald Dicker, Onno Wismans, Paul de Haas, Koen van Ingen Schenau, Jo Finders, Bert Vleeming, Geert Storms, Patrick Jaenen, Shaunee Cheng, Mireille Maenhoudt

Author Affiliations +

Proceedings Volume 6520, Optical Microlithography XX; 65200G (2007) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.714278
Event: SPIE Advanced Lithography, 2007, San Jose, California, United States

Abstract

We present results from investigating critical challenges of pitch doubling through Double Patterning to meet manufacturing requirements for 32nm ¹/₂ pitch on 1.2NA lithography system. Simulations of lithography alternatives identified manufacturable Dose-Focus latitudes for a dual-line positive process option which led to an experimental setup based on a single hardmask process. Key challenges of the selected process relate to the presence or absence of the hardmask layer during 1^st or 2^nd patterning step. This has an effect on wafer topography, process setup, etch bias and wafer litho-to-etch CDU offsets, which will create two final CDU populations. Therefore, there are two metrology challenges, separation between the two CD populations and overlay-at-resolution using CDSEM. They were addressed by designing appropriate CD and overlay targets and by implementing an adequate dense sampling allowing modeling of wafer and field CD distributions. We introduced a new CDU model to calculate double patterning budgets based on defining CD from its edges and pooling CD variance from two adjacent patterns within 2*Pitch distance. For a single line and 1.35NA system, the model predicted 3.1nm variance with mask CDU and etch bias being the major contributors. We achieved an experimental resolution of 32-nm ¹/₂ pitch on 1.2NA system, which equals 0.20k1. Experimental results at 32-nm resolution were confirmed in a pre-manufacturing environment on a full lot of 24 wafers, with raw CDU of 6nm (3s). After modeling and correcting for interfield (wafer) and intrafield spatial distributions, CDU was improved to 2.5nm (3s). Best overlay results equaled scanner SMO capability of ~7nm (mean+3s).

Citation Download Citation

Mircea Dusa, John Quaedackers, Olaf F. A. Larsen, Jeroen Meessen, Eddy van der Heijden, Gerald Dicker, Onno Wismans, Paul de Haas, Koen van Ingen Schenau, Jo Finders, Bert Vleeming, Geert Storms, Patrick Jaenen, Shaunee Cheng, and Mireille Maenhoudt "Pitch doubling through dual-patterning lithography challenges in integration and litho budgets", Proc. SPIE 6520, Optical Microlithography XX, 65200G (27 March 2007); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.714278

ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE

INSTITUTIONAL
Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.

SELECT YOUR INSTITUTION

PERSONAL
Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.

PERSONAL SIGN IN

No SPIE Account? Create one

PURCHASE THIS CONTENT

SUBSCRIBE TO DIGITAL LIBRARY

50 downloads per 1-year subscription

Members: $195

Non-members: $335 ADD TO CART

25 downloads per 1 - year subscription

Members: $145

Non-members: $250 ADD TO CART

PURCHASE SINGLE ARTICLE

Includes PDF, HTML & Video, when available