|
1.INTRODUCTIONGRAVITY combines the beams from four telescopes interferometrically and provides high-resolution imaging as well as narrow-angle astrometry together with spectroscopic and polarimetric capabilities. For phase-referenced imaging and precision-astrometry of order 10 μas, this adaptive-optics assisted beam combiner (BC) observes two celestial objects simultaneously in dual-field mode. In this way, GRAVITY will revolutionize dynamical measurements of astronomical targets. In particular, its primary science goal is to probe physics in the Galactic Center close to the event horizon of the supermassive black hole, where certain effects predicted by the theory of general relativity are expected to take place. For this purpose, GRAVITY consists of three main components: the infrared wavefront sensors, the actual beam combiner instrument (BCI) and the laser metrology system. The latter determines the differential optical path difference (dOPD) between the science and the reference object resulting from their angular separation on sky. To that end, the metrology system measures internal dOPDs within the interferometer and subtracts them from the measured dOPDs between the targets to extract their dOPD on sky. Here, we present the general concept of the metrology which consists of a three-beam laser system injected via fiber optics to the BCI of GRAVITY and a homodyne detection scheme for three-beam interference using phase-shifting interferometry. In more detail, the metrology measures the phases of laser fringe patterns created in the pupil planes of the telescopes, from which the internal dOPDs can be derived. The developed system fulfills the following physical requirements:
Subsequently, we describe the working principle of the metrology system followed by its implementation and a few concluding remarks. 2.WORKING PRINCIPLEThe working principle of the metrology system is demonstrated in Figure 1. The metrology traces all the optical paths from the beam combination of the astronomical light back to the telescopes. Since its measurements cover the full path of the instrument and the VLTI up to the primary mirror M1 and are performed in the pupil plane at fixed positions with respect to M1 after reflection on the latter, the definition of the astrometric narrow-angle baselines is essentially free of systematics.1 In addition, the pupil is sampled at typical radii such that potential systematics due to differential focus is eliminated. The basic concept is to split laser light into three beams with fixed phase relations. Two of the beams are faint and injected backwards into the two BCs of the celestial objects. The third, high-power beam is overlaid on top of the two faint ones after they have passed fibers within the BCI. This approach is chosen in order to minimize inelastic scattering of the metrology light in the instrument fibers, which is backscattered onto the science detector. In more detail, fluorescence of the rare earth elements Holmium (Ho3+) and Thulium (Tm3+) as well as Raman emission in fluoride fibers, both excited by the metrology laser wavelength, can be observed in the detector band. Another advantage of this three-beam implementation is the suppression of non-common path effects from variations of high-power laser radiation. Their origin lies in the injection of the metrology light to the BCs which introduces optical paths that the science light does not travel, therefore the term “non-common”. A certain part of these paths appears in the astrometric error budget and should not drift more than a few nanometers during an observation block. However, high laser powers can induce temperature fluctuations in the metrology injection fibers which result in variations of the fiber length implying such drifts.2 At telescope level, the three light beams interfere in the pupil plane and form a fringe pattern which in principle carries the individual interferences between three beams. Temporal sampling of this fringe pattern with photodiodes allows for extracting the phase corresponding to the internal dOPD between the light paths of the reference and science object from one telescope. The phase of interest corresponds to the one of the interference between the faint beams which alone would be undetectably faint. Therefore, the third beam serves as an amplification for the fringe pattern. This is why, for the actual measurement of the phase between the faint beams, we analyze their individual interference with the third beam independently by phase-shifting each of them with a characteristic frequency. By means of lock-in amplifiers referenced to those frequencies the phases of the corresponding fringes can be extracted and in difference provide the desired internal dOPD between science and reference path while the phase of the high-power beam cancels out. Since we are only interested in the oscillating terms of the interference carrying the phase information, the AC signal, and not the average level of the oscillation, the metrology receivers are AC-coupled. This realization corresponds to a homodyne detection scheme in the sense that the lock-in amplifiers use the frequencies with which the metrology signals are modulated as reference. Knowing the internal dOPDs for two telescopes encoded in the phases Φ1 and Φ2 allows for calculating the dOPD on sky between the observed objects as seen by this baseline from the difference of the astronomical fringe phases ΨA and ΨB measured on detector A and B via This formula includes the effective wavelengths of the light of star A and B, λA and λB, as well as the wavelength of the metrology laser λL. In total, six baselines between four telescopes are addressed in that way. The contributions δ1 and δ2 denote the non-common path terms in the metrology injection which need to be calibrated for the data reduction3 by swapping the light of two nearby stars between the BCs in order to determine the zero points of the metrology phases. These measurements are not performed online but in the preset of an observation. 3.IMPLEMENTATIONThe final system design consists of three main parts, namely the injection of the metrology laser light into the BCI, its detection in the latter and at telescope level as well as of the computing hardware and software. The GRAVITY software was presented in Reference 4 and 5 while this contribution focuses on the other aspects. The implemented hardware is sketched in Figure 2 and the corresponding components are listed in Table 1. Here, we discuss selected key items. Table 1.List of the metrology hardware. The metrology system can be split into 3 subsystems: injection, detection and computing. Part of the injection components are located outside of the BCI, others are inside.
3.1LaserThe stabilized single frequency laser source from Menlo Systems produces light at a wavelength slightly below the astronomical K-band of 2.0 μm to 2.5 μm and has the following properties:
3.2Phase shiftersThe Photline phase shifters are electro-optic devices employing lithium niobate (LiNbO3) crystals in which a change of refractive index can be induced by applying a voltage. Since this material is highly birefringent i. e. it has two transmission axes with different refractive indices, the linear polarized optical input should be aligned to one of these axes to maintain the linear polarization of the laser light otherwise elliptical polarization would be introduced when feeding both axes. However, due to many fiber connections in between the phase modulators and the laser source small misalignments can occur in the setup presented here. As a consequence, we spliced fiber polarizers from Thorlabs to the in- and output fibers of the phase shifters in order to correct for possible mismatches in front of and behind the devices. We apply two different phase-modulating frequencies for the science and reference metrology beam, both in the kilohertz-range. 3.3Fiber positioner unitsFrom this point the metrology light enters the two custom-made fiber positioner units which couple the laser beams to the BCs which are realized as integrated optics6 (IO). In order to send light to all four telescopes, two of the 24 IO outputs (6 baselines x 4 phases = 24) need to be illuminated as demonstrated in Figure 3. For this reason the two beams are split again into two of equal intensity by means of LEONI fiber splitters which we denote as exit splitters. Their output fibers, not connectorized but cleaved, are glued into v-grooves on xyz-piezo actuators from SmarAct such that each fiber can be aligned remotely to the desired IO output via free-beam coupling optics. The positioning accuracy and the maximum position drift are smaller than 0.05 μm. In order to minimize non-common path effects to a negligible level of the error budget the output fibers are kept as short as possible (≈ 5 cm) and their maximum difference in length is 1 mm. Furthermore, those fibers are single-mode (SM) but not polarization-maintaining (PM) in contrast to the other parts of the metrology chain including the input fibers of the exit splitter. This design leads to smaller changes of the output polarization state from bending of the fibers by actuators than for PM fibers as shown in laboratory tests. The short SM fibers maintain the polarization state nevertheless because their beat length is much larger than the actual fiber length other than for the birefringent PM fibers. 3.4Injection OpticsThe output of the exit splitters is then guided through injection optics illustrated in Figure 4. Essentially, they consist of collimators, a dichroic, a beam dump as well as a filter and are part of the GRAVITY spectrometers.7 A demagnification factor of 1.897 is realized to match the Gaussian modes of the metrology fibers with mode field radius (MFD) of 12.9 μm and the IO with MFD 6.8 μm for the metrology wavelength. As such, the output fibers of the exit splitters need to be positioned at a distance of 340 μm to each other in order to map the distance between the IO channels of 180 μm. The dichroic reflects the metrology light onto the BC while the passing fraction of the light is captured by the beam dump. Two filters behind the dichroic block the back-reflected laser light of 1908 nm going in the direction of the detector. 3.5DetectionAfter the injection of the two metrology beams to the BCs they travel all the paths of the astronomical light backwards up to the telescopes where their interference pattern is sampled in the pupil plane by four receivers per telescopes. More precisely the corresponding photodiode boxes are mounted at the four spider arms above the primary mirror M1 at the entrance pupil of the secondary mirror M2. This design is realized at the Unit Telescopes (UTs) of the VLTI as well as at the Auxiliary Telescopes (ATs). As all the receivers are installed at the same radius the average phase is independent of tip and tilt. Before, this radius was optimized for the average to be focus-independent. The receivers are equipped with optics that focus the incoming light onto the sensitive area of the photodiode of 0.25 mm in diameter by a Thorlabs lens and suppress background light by a line filter from Filtrop. Via electronics built here at MPE, the input signals detected by the diodes from Laser Components are then amplified in two stages. The AC coupling mentioned in section 2 is implemented after the first amplification stage. In addition to those telescope detectors, four receivers are installed within the BCI as internal reference, one per telescope. These diodes are located in the fiber couplers8 (FC) and also pick up the metrology light in the pupil, but with a multimode fiber glued onto the back of a lens. The picked-up light is then detected by means of a fiber-to-photodiode coupler from OZ Optics. A similar set of four diodes is placed in the calibration unit9 (CU) of the instrument which mimics the telescope signals when operating GRAVITY in stand-alone or calibration mode. The final step of the metrology detection is the processing by the Femto lock-in amplifiers, two per detected analog voltage signal, in order to lock onto the two different phase-shifting frequencies of the science and reference metrology beam as outlined above. Function generators from Keysight induce the phase modulation by linear voltage ramps which at the same time provide the reference frequency for the lock-in detection. The amplifier itself produces two signals proportional to the sine and cosine of the phase between the carrier beam and one of the faint beams. In total we therefore record 80 signals coming from 4 telescopes with 4 receivers each plus 4 internal ones, so a total of 20 detectors. Each of the receivers is locked by 2 amplifiers to extract the two phases of each of the faint beams with the carrier beam, which in turn produce 2 signals such that in the end 20 detectors produce 80 signals. These 80 voltages are read via analog-to-digital converter (ADC) cards into the real-time computer (RTC). For the latter we use a dedicated local control unit (LCU) called lgvmet. The phase information required for the determination of the internal dOPDs can be calculated from those signals. This metrology design allows for nanometer-precision measurements in GRAVITY’s astrometric mode. Concluding remarks are presented in the following last section. 4.CONCLUSIONSGRAVITY aims for precision-astrometry of order 10 μas by observing two celestial objects in dual-field mode. For doing so, the dOPD corresponding to the angular separation between the two needs to be determined by tracking the internal dOPDs within the interferometer. These internal measurements are performed by a dedicated metrology system consisting of a three-beam laser system. A homodyne detection scheme is used to analyze the resulting three-beam interference by means of lock-in amplifiers and phase-shifting. The main physical requirements for the operation of the metrology are the fringe detection in primary mirror space, a minimized light level of the metrology within the BCI and errors on the phase measurements of nanometer-level. The fringe detection in the pupil plane of the telescopes is given by the metrology design, while the low light level and the required phase error need to be balanced against each other. The low light level is needed in order to minimize non-common path effects and backscattering of the metrology light onto the science detectors. However, the phase error is determined by the inverse SNR which in turn decreases with lower light levels and thus increases the error on the phase measurement. In autumn 2015, GRAVITY was integrated in the VLTI structure and since then has been undergoing various perfomance tests in combination with technical work. In this respect, the detection elements required for the metrology system were installed at all eight telescopes. In particular, the receivers were aligned optically to maximize the detected metrology signal and radially positioned by means of a laser tracker with an accuracy of less than 1 mm for a focus-independent phase average over the illuminated pupil. At the time of writing the project is still in its commissioning phase and we are optimizing the metrology performance on this basis, in particular investigating on the lowest light levels and SNRs respectively which the metrology system can operate on. REFERENCESLacour, S.,
“The interferometric baselines and GRAVITY astrometric error budget,”
in Proc. SPIE,
91462E
(2014). Google Scholar
Kok, Y.,
“GRAVITY: the impact of non-common optical paths within the metrology system,”
[Optical and Infrared Interferometry IV], , Google Scholar
Lapeyrere, V.,
“GRAVITY data reduction software,”
in Proc. SPIE,
91462D
(2014). Google Scholar
Burtscher, L.,
“The GRAVITY instrument software/high-level software,”
in Proc. SPIE,
91462B
(2014). Google Scholar
Ott, T.,
“The GRAVITY instrument software/hardware related aspects,”
in Proc. SPIE,
91462A
(2014). Google Scholar
Jocou, L.,
“The integrated optics beam combiner assembly of the GRAVITY/VLTI instrument,”
in Proc. SPIE,
84452X
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.925556 Google Scholar
Straubmeier, C.,
“The GRAVITY spectrometers: optical design and first light,”
in Proc. SPIE,
914629
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2054736 Google Scholar
Pfuhl, O.,
“The fiber coupler and beam stabilization system of the GRAVITY interferometer,”
in Proc. SPIE,
914623
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055080 Google Scholar
Blind, N.,
“GRAVITY: the calibration unit,”
in Proc. SPIE,
91461U
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2055542 Google Scholar
|