|
1.IntroductionSelective adsorption of specific salivary biopolymers on the enamel surface leads to the formation of an acquired salivary pellicle.1 The adsorbed protein layer can be considered a dynamic biofilm that regulates and modulates interactions at the interface between the tooth surface and oral cavity.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The pellicle serves as a lubricant, protecting the dentition against abrasion and attrition.1 In addition, the salivary pellicle may protect against demineralization of dental hard tissues caused by acid attack.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 The adsorbed pellicular phosphoproteins and mucins reduce enamel surface solubility, acting as a perm-selective membrane and regulating not only the diffusion of calcium and phosphate ions, but also the acidic agents.1, 2, 3, 4, 5 In addition to its protective functions of lubricating, inhibiting demineralization, and working as a diffusion barrier against chemical attacks of the enamel, the pellicle can act as a reservoir of agents promoting remineralization. The maturation age of the pellicle, when it can effectively inhibit erosive activity, remains unclear. Oral biofilm contains a multitude of factors important to oral microbial ecology and tissue surface properties. It is directly implicated in the etiology of oral soft tissue pathologies, including periodontal disease, providing a binding site for pathogenic bacteria.6, 7 The morphology of the oral biofilm layer appears to affect bacterial binding to the tooth surface.6, 7 Current characterizations of the pellicle regarding its composition, architecture, and chemistry are based on in vitro or ex vivo studies. Noninvasive in situ characterization and mapping of the salivary pellicle remains elusive. The effects of specific events in the oral cavity such as eating, oral hygiene, preventive, restorative, and pharmacological agents on in vivo salivary pellicle presence, structure, and properties remain, to a large extent, unknown. The primary obstacle has been the inability to noninvasively characterize in vivo the presence, structure, and dynamics of the acquired salivary pellicle. Yet such capability is crucial to a better understanding of oral pathogenesis, prevention, and therapeutics. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a high-resolution optical technique that permits minimally invasive imaging of near-surface abnormalities in complex tissues. Its principles are described in the literature.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 Crosssectional images of tissues are constructed in real time, at near histologic resolution (approximately with our current technology). This permits in vivo noninvasive imaging of the macroscopic characteristics of surface and subsurface tissues. Two-dimensional images may be combined to generate 3-D images that can be sectioned and manipulated in many ways. In vivo OCT images are acquired in seconds or less using a hand-held probe, so they can easily be used in the clinical setting. Higher resolution in vivo OCT imaging is possible by using optical coherence microscopy (OCM).14, 15 OCT or OCM can be combined with in vivo multiphoton microscopy (MPM), generating high-resolution imaging of specific tissue components and fluorescence using many wavelengths of light.16 The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of multimodality noninvasive imaging to visualize, characterize, and quantify the acquired salivary pellicle. The development of such a capability will, in the long term, serve to improve diagnostic, preventive, and interventional capabilities in the oral cavity, and to provide a better understanding of physiological and pathological processes related to oral hard tissues. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Tooth Preparation15 clinically and radiographically caries-free human molars and anterior teeth with sound smooth surfaces were used. They had been newly extracted due to severe periodontitis. These samples were cleaned and polished with pumice slurry and a cotton wheel to remove organic contaminants. 30 enamel blocks were produced from the smooth surfaces of each tooth using a water-cooled diamond disk (DynaFlex®, NTI, Germany) connected to a low speed microengine (Rite torque V, Rite Dent, Miami, Florida) (Table 1 ). To remove any fine debris or bacterial remnants, the enamel blocks were sterilized with 50% ethanol for , cleaned with running distilled water for , and then put in an ultrasound cleaner for . Table 1Sample preparation. Total number of tooth samples in the study: n=30 .
Each sample was fixed in a silicone mold (Vinyl Polysiloxane Kit, Defend®, Mydent International, Hauppauge, New York) to ensure a stable position during incubation and imaging (Fig. 1 ) and marked with two sharp oil ink points to ensure accurate reproducible multiple imaging at the same location. 2.2.Collection of Experimental SalivaOne healthy donor ( -old male) with good systemic and oral health (devoid of any medication or special dietary habits, salivary gland diseases, caries lesions, periodontal pathology, and salivary dysfunctions) was used as a source for the salivary samples to eliminate variation in the samples. The human subject gave written informed consent prior to participation in this study, which was approved by the University of California, Irvine IRB (approval 2002-2805). To ensure an equilibrated oral environment, the donor refrained from eating, drinking, and brushing at least prior to the study. Also, the donor refrained from using fluoridated dentifrices and mouthwash at least prior to sample collection. The donor was permitted to engage in regular oral hygiene procedures (brushing and flossing) immediately after breakfast on the experimental day. Parotid and submandibular / sublingual saliva was collected by means of an ice-chilled sterile centrifuge tube using light stimulation with 2% citric acid after chewing on a piece of paraffin (3M Company, Minneapolis, Minnesota). Collection always occurred in the morning between 9 to 10 AM to minimize the effects of diurnal changes in saliva composition. After collection, a few milliliters of whole saliva were discarded to minimize the amount of oral debris. Collected saliva was clarified by centrifugation at to remove cellular debris. The clear supernatant was mixed with 0.02% sodium azide to prevent bacterial growth and stored at in a cold room prior to the experiment (Fig. 2 ). All saliva samples were used on the day of collection. 2.3.Pellicle FormationExperimental pellicles were formed by time-based incubation (0, 10, 30, 60, , and ) of the tooth samples with of the saliva. Each specimen was incubated with its own aliquot of saliva at to avoid interaction between the tooth samples. The time points for incubation were selected based on the literature and the determinative role that pellicle age plays in defining the in vivo dentition’s response to acid attack. After incubation, excessive saliva and loosely bound proteins were removed from the tooth surface by a brief, careful rinsing with distilled water to avoid damaging the developing salivary pellicle. Tooth samples for the control group were incubated under the same conditions, but in distilled water rather than saliva. During incubation, whether in saliva or distilled water, all samples were stirred gently at intervals. 2.4.ImagingIn addition to conventional OCT, multimodality imaging OCM connected to multiphoton microscopy (MPM) was used to improve resolution and imaging specificity. Fluorescein and Coolblue (Coolblue®, Pfizer, New York) dyes were used as optical contrast agents during fluorescence imaging with MPM. Each dye was mixed with saliva at a 1:100 volume ratio. Second harmonic generation (SHG) and two photon excited fluorescence (TPEF) images were acquired for comparison with OCM images. To ensure accurate relocalization during sequential reimaging events, the silicone and acrylic molds were stably fixed on the adjustable imaging stage using a holder, and the visible imaging aiming beam scanned in a line between the two oil ink marker points. During MPM and OCM imaging, all of the samples were protected with a thin clear imaging glass cover with border sealing using silicone materials to reduce the effects of dehydration. In addition, -thickness polyethylene film with a window was seated under the imaging site to prevent direct contact between the salivary pellicle and the imaging glass (Fig. 3 ). 3.Results3.1.Time-Based Salivary Pellicle Development3.1.1.Optical coherence tomography imagesOver time, the saliva-incubated samples showed a gradual increase in surface signal in the top view of the 3 D reconstructed OCT images [Fig. 4b ]. This implies surface pellicle development in the samples incubated in saliva over . In contrast, the samples incubated in distilled water did not show a change in surface signal over time [Fig 4a]. 3.1.2.Optical coherence microscopyOCM images were superimposed with reflectance and secondharmonic images from microscopy. Fluorescein and Coolblue (Coolblue®, Pfizer, New York) were used as dye for the fluorescent images. After of incubation, the samples incubated in saliva showed a clearly distinguishable layer averaging in thickness, [Figs. 5c and 5d ]. The thickness was subject to intersample and intrasample variations. The samples incubated in distilled water did not demonstrate any distinct layer between the tooth and the water [Figs. 5a and 5b]. 3.1.3.Multiphoton microscopyAfter of incubation in saliva, a layer exceeding in thickness was visible at the interface between tooth and saliva [Figs. 6d, 6e, 6f ]. Enamel rod structures, which were visible prior to incubation with saliva, became progressively covered by the developing overlying pellicle layer. In control samples incubated in distilled water [Figs. 6a, 6b, 6c], enamel rod structures remained visible throughout the study. 3.1.4.Growth and development of pellicleOver time, the developing pellicle layers showed maturation of the initial globular-like pellicle “seeds.” Images showed pellicle island presence and growth (Figs. 7 and 8 ). The early globular pellicle islands varied in size and appeared to be randomly distributed on the sample surfaces (Fig. 7). Over time, the number and size of these islands gradually increased [Figs. 8a through 8d]. Eventually, a pellicle layer covered the entire sample surface, once the islands had fused [Fig. 8d]. 4.DiscussionSaliva secretion is a complex process, with most saliva by volume being secreted by the major salivary glands, and the remaining amount coming from the minor glands. Saliva contains a multitude of factors important to oral microbial ecology, biofilm formation, and health. Loss of salivation may result in rampant tooth decay.1, 2 This point becomes increasingly important given the high cariogenicity of the present day Western diet, not only due to the high amount of fermentable carbohydrates, but also because food intake occurs with high frequency throughout the day. Pellicle formation is a dynamic process that is continuously influenced by adsorption-desorption processes, structural modification of adsorbed molecules by microbial or host enzymes, and intermolecular complexion with other macromolecules.1, 2 The salivary pellicle serves to protect dental enamel against hostile conditions that include abrupt changes in pH and temperature, combined with high repetitive mechanical loading during mastication. It mitigates against a wide range of conditions, including enamel erosion, abrasion, and decay, while concurrently mediating a host of biological responses to permit adhesion of microbial and host cells1, 17 Although there is general agreement regarding the importance of the salivary pellicle, many unknowns remain, including definition, formation, thickness, and maturation of the pellicle. One commonly used definition describes the pellicle as a “bacteria-free, proteinaceous” dynamic film.18 Sometimes it is identified as a multilayered film that is formed initially by the selective adsorption of salivary molecules to oral surfaces followed by homo- or heterotypic complexion of these molecules with other molecules in the ambient saliva.18 During this study, multilayered pellicles were occasionally seen in MPM images [Fig. 8b], but most of the samples showed one blunt pellicle layer [Figs. 5c, 5d, 6b, 8a, 8c, 8d]. These multilayered pellicles disappeared with pellicle maturation (Fig. 8), so that perhaps these layers may represent an early stage in the maturation process of the pellicle. The reported time for salivary pellicle formation varies enormously, Widely divergent estimates for time to maturation of the oral biofilm are reported from in vitro studies, ranging from a few minutes to several days.2 This factor is important because the in vivo pellicle is periodically removed or altered by mechanical or chemical influences such as tooth brushing or chemical rinses. It has been suggested that only mature, several-days-old salivary pellicles can effectively inhibit the erosive attack of acidic agents.4 However, in another study, no significant differences were identified in enamel protective function between and -old salivary pellicles formed in situ.5 According to Amaechi 19 erosive destruction of the enamel surface is considerably reduced by the presence of -old salivary pellicle. Indeed, according to recent findings,5 enamel protection by salivary pellicle formed in situ over periods ranging from is independent of pellicle age. In this study, OCT showed a significant signal increase, implying the formation of salivary pellicle over the tooth surface after approximately of incubation in saliva [Fig. 4b]. Little is known regarding variations of in vivo salivary pellicle thickness between individuals, upper versus lower arches, and specific locations on each tooth. Yet this factor may considerably influence the sites and severity of dental erosion, as well as de- and remineralization, outright decay, and other hard and soft tissue pathologies. Reports of oral biofilm thickness from in vitro studies range from .6, 7, 20, 21 These discrepancies may in part be due to varying rates and amounts of salivary protein and glycoprotein adsorption to the enamel surface. Data from some studies suggest that oral biofilm composition may well be site-dependent. Factors may include the nature of the underlying tissue (smooth surface versus fissure versus periodontal sulcus), proximity to salivary duct openings, differing redox potentials, or nutrient availability. To date, mapping oral biofilm in vivo to evaluate effects of specific factors on biofilm presence and characteristics has not been possible due to lack of a noninvasive diagnostic modality. However, data from ex vivo studies have been weakened by the very real potential for damage or alteration of the salivary pellicle during sample preparation for imaging. The morphology of the pellicle layer has mainly been visualized using scanning and transmission electron microscopy techniques. Typically, sample preparation involves fixing and dehydrating, which may affect the morphology of the pellicle in comparison to its normally hydrated state. Although atomic force microscopy (AFM) can reduce the required imaging time, there is always the possibility of dehydration during imaging.22 In this study, potential modifiers of the salivary pellicle such as dehydration and mechanical damage were avoided by use of a specially designed incubating stage and imaging dish [Figs. 1a, 1b, 3]. An average of thickness of salivary pellicle was observed after of incubation [Figs. 5c, 5d, 6b, 10(c), and 10(d)]. The initial adsorption of discrete salivary proteins onto the enamel surface may result from electrostatic interactions through the hydrophilic regions, leaving the more hydrophobic parts of the salivary protein molecules exposed at the surface.23 Enhanced adhesion to the initial protein layer has been mentioned as the cause of the globular surface morphology of acquired salivary pellicle, with globule diameters ranging from after of incubation.21 In this study, globular pellicle formation was also identified (Figs. 7, 8, and 9). The number and diameter of globules increased gradually until they eventually fused (Fig. 8). This observation may explain the large range of globule sizes and pellicle thicknesses described by previous researches. Moreover, size and distribution of globules may be affected by underlying hard tissue surface characteristics and by the chemical composition of the saliva in a specific location. 5.ConclusionThis study demonstrates the potential of using a noninvasive optical approach for precise in situ imaging of the human salivary pellicle. While this study is performed ex vivo, rapid innovation in probe development should permit in vivo in situ imaging of salivary pellicle in the near future. AcknowlegmentsWe gratefully acknowledge the support of GlaxoSmithKline Pharmaceuticals, NIH (LAMMP) RR01192, and Military Photomedicine Program, AFSOR Grant No. FA9550-08-1-00384. ReferencesM. Hannig, M. Fiebiger, M. Güntzer, A. Döbert, R. Zimehl, and Y. Nekrashevych,
“Protective effect of the in situ formed short-term salivary pellicle,”
Arch. Oral Biol., 49 903
–910
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.01.005 0003-9969 Google Scholar
A. V. Nieuw Amerongen, C. H. Oderkerk, and A. A. Driessen,
“Role of mucins from human whole saliva in the protection of tooth enamel against demineralization in vitro,”
Caries Res., 21 297
–309
(1987). 0008-6568 Google Scholar
C. Hannig, M. Wasser, K. Becker, M. Hannig, K. Huber, and T. Attin,
“Influence of different restorative materials on lysozyme and amylase activity of the salivary pellicle in situ,”
J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A, 78A 755
–761
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.30758 1549-3296 Google Scholar
R. T. Zahradnik, E. C. Moreno, and E. J. Burke,
“Effect of salivary pellicle on enamel subsurface demineralization in vitro,”
J. Dent. Res., 55 664
–670
(1976). 0022-0345 Google Scholar
M. Hannig, N. J. Hess, W. Hoth-Hannig, and M. de Vrese,
“Influence of salivary pellicle formation time on enamel demineralization-an in situ pilot study,”
Clin. Oral Investig., 7 158
–161
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-003-0219-2 1432-6981 Google Scholar
K. M. Schilling and W. H. Bowe,
“Glucans synthesized in situ in experimental salivary pellicle function as specific binding sites for streptococcus mutans,”
Infect. Immun., 60 284
–295
(1992). 0019-9567 Google Scholar
K. Gong, L. Mailloux, and M. C. Herzberg,
“Salivary film expresses a complex, macromolecular binding site for streptococcus sanguis,”
J. Biol. Chem., 275 8970
–8974
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.275.12.8970 0021-9258 Google Scholar
J. A. Izatt, K. Kobayashi, M. V. Sivak,
“Optical coherence tomography for biodiagnostics,”
Opt. Photonics News, 8 41
–47
(1997). 1047-6938 Google Scholar
Z. Ding, H. Ren, Y. Zhao, J. S. Nelson, and Z. Chen,
“High-resolution optical coherence tomography over a large depth range with an axicon lens,”
Opt. Lett., 27 243
–245
(2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.27.000243 0146-9592 Google Scholar
D. S. E. Huang, C. P. Lin, J. S. Schuman,
“Optical coherence tomography,”
Science, 254 1178
–1191
(1991). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1957169 0036-8075 Google Scholar
J. G. H. M. Fujimoto, J. A. Izatt, S. A. Boppart,
“Biomedical imaging using optical coherent tomography,”
Proc. SPIE, 3749 402
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.354807 0277-786X Google Scholar
B. T. G. Bouma, S. A. Boppart, M. R. Hee,
“High-resolution optical coherence tomographic imaging using a mode-locked Ti:Al/sub 2/O/ sub 3/ laser source,”
Opt. Lett., 20 1486
–1488
(1995). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.20.001486 0146-9592 Google Scholar
S. A. Boppart,
“Optical coherence tomography: technology and applications for neuroimaging,”
Psychophysiology, 40 529
–541
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00055 0048-5772 Google Scholar
D. E. Vokes, R. Jackson, S. Guo, J. A. Perez, J. Su, J. M. Ridgway, W. B. Armstrong, Z. Chen, and B. J. Wong,
“Optical coherence tomography-enhanced microlaryngoscopy: preliminary report of a noncontact optical coherence tomography system integrated with a surgical microscope,”
Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol., 117
(7), 538
–547
(2008). 0003-4894 Google Scholar
R. G. Chelliyil, T. S. Ralston, D. L. Marks, and S. A. Boppart,
“High-speed processing architecture for spectral-domain optical coherence microscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 13
(4), 44013
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2960018 1083-3668 Google Scholar
C. Sumen, T. R. Mempel, I. B. Mazo, and U. H. von Andrian,
“Intravital microscopy: visualizing immunity in context,”
Immunity, 21
(3), 315
–329
(2004). 1074-7613 Google Scholar
A. Carlén, L. Eliasson, G. Aronsson, and D. Birkhed,
“Human minor and major gland saliva proteins and ability to mediate Actinomyces naeslundii adherence,”
Arch. Oral Biol., 49
(3), 177
–181
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2003.09.001 0003-9969 Google Scholar
K. P. Leung, T. D. Crowe, J. J. Abercrombie, C. M. Molina, C. J. Bradshaw, C. L. Jensen, Q. Luo, G. A. Thompson,
“Control of oral biofilm formation by an antimicrobial decapeptide,”
J. Dent. Res., 84 1172
–1177
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508401215 0022-0345 Google Scholar
B. T. Amaechi, S. M. Higham, W. M. Edgar, and A. Milosevic,
“Thickness of acquired salivary pellicle as a determinant of the sites of dental erosion,”
J. Dent. Res., 78
(12), 1821
–1828
(1999). https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780120901 0022-0345 Google Scholar
U. Lendenmann, J. Grogan, and F. G. Oppenheim,
“Saliva and dental pellicle—A Review,”
Adv. Dent. Res., 14 22
–28
(2000). https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374000140010301 0895-9374 Google Scholar
M. E. Dickinson, and A. B. Mann,
“Nanoscale characteristics of salivary pellicle,”
Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 841 231
–236
(2005). 0272-9172 Google Scholar
A. Arvidsson, C. D. Löfgren, C. E. Christersson, P. O. Glantz, and A. Wennerberg,
“Characterization of structures in salivary secretion film formation. An experimental study with atomic force microscopy,”
Biofouling, 20
(3), 181
–188
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010400001790 Google Scholar
L. Lindh,
“On the adsorption behaviour of saliva and purified salivary proteins at solid/liquid interfaces,”
Swed Dent. J. Suppl., 152 1
–57
(2002). 0348-6672 Google Scholar
|