|
1.IntroductionConsiderable progress has been made in the area of optical microscopes and their applications during the past two decades.1–8 Optical tools with numerous variations and techniques have become a major part of research and development in the biorelated fields. Usage of through-focus (TF) optical imaging is steadily gaining momentum, particularly in biological applications.9–16 TF imaging is sometimes informally and interchangeably referred to using terms such as volumetric, out-of-focus, blurred, defocused, extended-focused, extended-depth-of-field, axial scanning, and three-dimensional (3-D) imaging. Several uses of the TF optical image applications such as biological imaging, microscopy, adaptive optics, material processing, optical data storage, and optical inspection have been reported.17 In this paragraph, we highlight some specific applications and methods that use TF images. TF scanning optical microscopy (TSOM) makes use of a set of defocus optical images for 3-D shape metrology of target sizes ranging from sub-10 nm to over 100 μm, including nanoparticles,18,19 with subnanometer resolution.18–37 The ability to analyze optical illumination was also reported20 using the TSOM method. Much interest is given to two-photon (or multiphoton) microscopy that makes use of TF imaging to acquire 3-D volumetric data of biological samples, including brain tissue and bone calcium.11,14,15 High-speed TF imaging is used to track single-molecules in 3-D and observe their behavior during cell division,38 and it has also been used to image entire embryos.39 By simultaneously imaging different focal planes within the sample, it was possible to track the 3-D dynamics in live cells at high temporal and spatial resolution.12,13 3-D position, alignment, and orientation of submicroscopic features were made possible by TF polarization imaging in label-free as well as fluorescently labeled specimens.40 Cellular network dynamics such as spatiotemporal activity patterns in neuronal and astrocytic networks was demonstrated using TF imaging in 3-D.14 3-D automated nanoparticle tracking was demonstrated using TF images.41 2.Significance of TF Image CollectionThree important developments have increased the prevalence of TF imaging:
It is now firmly established that TF optical images are beneficial for many applications. A survey of prior work reveals that many optical methods for TF image collection have been developed. It would be impossible to describe or even mention all of them in this review. However, most of the methods that have been published are variations of a few unique or basic methods. We here review the TF methods that represent the foundation of most published techniques. 3.Through-Focus Image Collection MethodsIn this section, we describe most of the basic TF methods that have been published. These methods are depicted using simplified schematics and brief summaries. Note that in the following figures, the portions of the diagrams enclosed using dashed boxes indicate components or aspects of the technique that are unique to that particular method. Note also that some figures (e.g., Fig. 1) show multiple interrelated techniques. 3.1.Scanning the Sample Stage Along the Focus AxisSample stage scanning, shown schematically in Fig. 1(a), is the classic and the most widely used method to obtain TF images. It is simple and straightforward and nearly every optical microscope has some provision to adjust the sample along the focus axis: these methods range from manual focusing on basic instruments to more sophisticated motorized or piezoscans on high-end modern tools. The scanning range can be up to several tens of millimeters, and positional accuracy can be better than 10 nm. However, TF scan speeds are typically regarded as relatively slow. Depending on the focus scan range, the exposure time, and the number of focal steps required, the total scan time could extend up to several minutes. The focus accuracy of this TF technique can be among the best, with high reproducibility and low distortion. However, optical mechanical instability32 and illumination aberrations49,50 have also been reported for such systems. TF optical images collected by the stage-scanning method can be stacked at their respective focus positions to create a 3-D space filled with the optical intensities. Plotting the optical intensities in a vertical cross-section through this 3-D space results in a TSOM image [Fig. 1(e)]. Even though TSOM uses conventional optical images (i.e., not a resolution enhancement method), it provides subnanometer 3-D shape measurement resolution24 as it uses additional information present in the out-of-focus optical images. TSOM images are sensitive to changes in the (i) 3-D shape of a target,24,29 (ii) position of a target in a 3-D space,41 (iii) optical properties of a target, and (iv) illumination.20 A differential TSOM image (pixel-by-pixel difference between two well-aligned TSOM images) highlights all these differences with much higher signal-to-noise ratio compared to a conventional best-focus, top-down optical image.18,19 TSOM is a strong candidate to analyze the position, shape, and optical properties of soft nanoparticles (e.g., hydrogel nanoparticles) in their native liquid environment, in addition to hard nanoparticles.41 3.2.Scanning the Objective Lens Along the Focus AxisAnother method of collecting TF images is by scanning the objective lens along the focal axis [Fig. 1(b)], generally using piezomotors.14,41,51 A relatively high-speed TF image collection time of 200 ms has been reported41 using this method, which makes it suitable, e.g., for nanoparticle tracking in 3-D space. It is relatively easy to convert a conventional microscope into a TF image collecting tool by replacing its objective lens base with one of the several commercially available objective-scanning piezomotors. In this high-speed scanning mode, the image quality could be degraded. However, this approach has the advantage of not disturbing the specimen because the sample stage remains stationary during imaging. Mechanically, this method is more stable than the stage-scanning method. 3.3.Scanning the Image Plane Along the Focus AxisThrough focus image collection can also be accomplished by scanning the image plane or camera,12,32 as shown in Fig. 1(c). The same effect can also be achieved by scanning a replica of the image plane.52 This method is reported to have the advantage of avoiding the spherical aberration common to other optical refocusing systems; it also allows for fast TF scans, extending the working distance, and keeping the specimen on stage stationary and undisturbed.52 3.4.Multifocal Plane MicroscopyInstead of scanning the image plane, one alternative is to split the imaging beam into several fixed beams that are refocused simultaneously onto multiple cameras positioned at different focal distances,12,13,32 as shown in Fig. 1(d). This is also called image plane sharing microscopy.32 It has the main advantage of avoiding scanning altogether (of stage, objective or imaging plane). In this configuration, the TF images are collected simultaneously that enables high-speed TF image collection. However, since the imaging beam is split into several beams, the available optical intensity at each camera is reduced, which may lower the signal-to-noise ratio of the optical data, unless the collection time is increased. The number of focal planes available is also limited to the number of times the imaging beam is split. Since there are no moving (scanning) parts, this is one of the most mechanically stable configurations. 3.5.Wavelength Scanning MethodFor microscope objectives with chromatic aberration, differing wavelengths will have different focus positions. Normally microscope objectives are designed to minimize chromatic aberration. However, chromatic aberration can also be used to obtain TF images.32,34,53 In this method, both the chromatic aberrated objective and the sample stage are kept at fixed positions. Instead, the wavelength of illumination is varied (or wavelength-scanned) so each wavelength focuses at a different focus position on the sample, enabling TF image collection (Fig. 2). A variation of this approach, which utilizes the chromatic dependence of diffraction, has been developed using tricolored LED illumination and a spatial light modulator (SLM).53 Since the position of sample stage is not scanned, the wavelength scanning approach generally has superior mechanical stability compared to conventional stage-scanning optical microscopes. It also allows high-throughput TF image collection due to the ability to quickly and precisely tune the wavelength34 (faster than scanning a stage). 3.6.Flexible-Membrane Liquid LensWhile there are many variations in design and implementation, the general concept of the approach shown in Fig. 3(a) is that the fluid pressure inside two flexible membranes is varied to make the membranes inflate or deflate. This process alters the radius of curvature of the membranes and thus changes the effective focal length of the lens, allowing TF image collection.54–62 The membrane curvature can alternatively be varied by different mechanisms such as changing the aperture diameter thus squeezing the membranes.63 These lenses are generally fast, but are prone to have optical aberrations.56 3.7.Liquid-Tunable LensThis method, shown in Fig. 3(b), is also known as a variable focus liquid lens. These lenses utilize refraction at a liquid–liquid boundary interface. Focal adjustment is achieved by using a variable voltage to tune the curvature at the boundary interface of two immiscible liquids. A spherical surface is formed at the boundary of a polar and an apolar liquids. The curvature of the interface can be controlled by adjusting the relative wettability through electro-wetting.15 This creates a lens with variable focal length to enable TF image collection.15,55,63,64 Liquid lenses are relatively fast and very durable and exhibit a high degree of phase shift, i.e., focal length change. These lenses have a long functional life and low sensitivity to mechanical stress, and they are also advantageous for autofocus applications due to their relatively low power consumption. Liquid-tunable lenses have relatively low cost and are commercially available. However, the optical performance of liquid-tunable lenses suffers from significant spherical as well as higher-order, gravity-induced aberrations.56 3.8.Adaptive OpticsAs shown in Fig. 4, adaptive optical elements such as a tip/tilt or deformable mirror can be inserted into the optical path of a microscope to enable TF image collection.32,65,66 Common examples of adoptive optics elements are deformable mirror devices or liquid crystal SLMs. The adoptive optics is used to alter the phase of incident wave fronts to displace the focal spot. Tip/tilt applied to the adoptive optics shifts the focus laterally within the focal plane, while defocus translates along the optic axis.65 In the implementation with a tip/tilt mirror, a basic closed-loop quad cell is used to control the mirror. A high-order deformable mirror with a Shack–Hartmann sensor is used in the deformable mirror implementation. This approach can also correct high-order residual aberrations as well as performing the TF scanning without -axis movement. A key advantage of these methods is high-speed TF image collection (). Adaptive optics technology and hardware are readily available and are most commonly used for biological applications.16 3.9.Multifocus MicroscopyMultifocus microscopy (MFM) allows rapid and simultaneous acquisition of TF images using a single exposure (Fig. 5). Unlike a conventional microscope, there are no scanning parts.38–40 This is achieved by placing a multifocus grating (MFG) at the Fourier plane followed by a chromatic correction grating (CCG) and prism [Fig. 5(a)]. The combination of these elements divides the primary image into several TF images and simultaneously projects them onto the plane of the CCD camera. Unlike a conventional microscope, the CCD camera in MFM is divided into several squares, each one of which is used to collect one of the focal plane images [Fig. 5(b)]. To date, MFM has been used primarily for biology applications, and this technology is not yet widely available. 3.10.Aperture-Scanning Fourier PtychographyIn this method, an aperture is placed at the Fourier plane as shown in Fig. 5(c), and it is scanned in a raster manner while simultaneously collecting intensity images of the object. The acquired images are then synthesized in the frequency domain to recover the complex hologram of extended objects. This can then be digitally propagated into different planes along the optical axis to extract TF images of the object.67 An alternative method is to scan the camera instead of an aperture.67 Because of the requirement to scan certain parts, this approach could be slower. 3.11.Confocal MicroscopyIn confocal microscopy, out-of-focus image information is selectively discarded by placing a pin hole in front of the camera (Fig. 6). This allows collection of image-slices that contain primarily in-focus image information. By scanning the sample along the focal axis, multiple such image-slices through the sample are collected, and this enables a 3-D reconstruction of the sample surface. Numerous alternative implementations and variations on this basic method of data acquisition have been published. This is one of the most widely used TF imaging methods, particularly in biology. 3.12.Light Sheet MicroscopyIn light sheet microscopy (LSM), the sample (usually transparent or semitransparent) is illuminated from the side using a thin sheet of light. Typically, the light source is rigidly coupled to the objective and aligned with its focal plane (Fig. 7).68–70 By scanning the sample stage along the focal axis, volumetric images of the specimen can be obtained. In a strict sense, this method is not a TF method because the imaging plane is always in focus. However, it can extract 3-D volumetric image information similarly to a confocal microscope. Unlike a confocal microscope, however, the out-of-focus image information is not discarded, it is simply not illuminated. Numerous variations of this basic technique have been published.69,71 LSM is mainly used to study biological tissues. Because of the opacity of such tissues, 3-D imaging is typically limited to a depth of 500 to .72,73 However, in some studies, LSM appears to outperform confocal microscopy.10 3.13.Light Field MicroscopyIn this microscopy, a microlens array is inserted into the optical train of a conventional microscope between the main lens and sensor plane, and this enables the capture of light-fields of specimens in a single image (Fig. 8).74,75 TF images can then be extracted through application of 3-D deconvolution to this single image. LFM also has the capability to extract different perspective views from the single image. In an LFM, spatial resolution is determined by the number of microlenses. A disadvantage of LFM is the trade-off between spatial resolution and angular resolution.74 3.14.Phase Retrieval TechniquesPhase retrieval techniques make use of the relationship between phase and propagation direction in an optical microscope. This method initially requires a few TF images that are inverted to recover phase and amplitude quantitatively. By making use of the retrieved phase and the amplitude, the entire set of TF images can then be calculated.76–78 A variation of this method, which is sometimes called quantitative phase imaging, has found many useful applications in biology.79 3.15.Digital Holography MicroscopyHolographic microscopy (including digital holography) is a coherent imaging system, and its advantage lies in the instantaneous and quantitative acquisition of both amplitude and the phase information from the reconstruction of the wavefront.80–86 Digital holography microscopy can numerically extract TF images from a single experimentally recorded hologram without the need to move the sample (Fig. 9). The digital holographic approach has been successfully implemented to speed up TSOM image acquisition.31 Since no mechanical scanning is involved, and a complete set of TF images can be extracted from a single holographic image, it is a high-speed TF imaging method. 3.16.Other MethodsAcousto-optic lens scanning17 can achieve a pure focal scan at a very high speed (). This is accomplished using two adjacent counterpropagating acoustic waves with a synchronized frequency chirp so the transverse scans subtract to cancel each other, whereas the focal scans add. Acousto-optic modulators and acousto-optic scanners are used along with a laser beam, and there is a 180-deg phase shift between the two frequency-modulating signals. The light is focused on a CCD camera that is mounted on a translation stage and used to measure the focal distance. Temporal and spatial focusing87 achieves high TF speeds with no moving parts. Full-field optical coherence microscopy produces volumetric imaging with all in-focus images similar to confocal microscopy.88,89 It is based on the spatial coherence gate principle and generates in parallel complete two-dimensional TF type images without scanning. Many variations of the preceding general TF methods have also been published. Some are a combination of two (or more) TF methods with some other methods. For example, a combination of high speed sinusoidal vibration of the microscope objective along with “smart” movements of galvanometric scanners (to repeatedly scan the laser focus along a closed 3-D trajectory) enables high-speed acquisition of TF images for two-photon microscopy that permits fast fluorescence measurements.14 Optical images such as the TSOM images [Fig. 1(e)] can be constructed using any one of the TF method presented here. However, for the TF methods such as confocal and light-sheet microscopy, all the images are in-focus creating a different type of TSOM image. 4.TF Images Categorization4.1.Optical Data TypeTF optical images can be broadly divided into three types depending on the type of optical data
4.2.ScanningDepending on the presence or absence of scanning, TF image collection methods can be divided into two groups.
4.3.Image ExtractionDepending on the image extraction method, two groups of TF approaches can be formed:
A complete categorization of all the TF methods is presented in Table 1. Table 1Complete categorization of the TF scanning methods.
5.Speed and Quality of TF Image CollectionOne of the main challenges in modern optical microscopy is fast and sensitive acquisition of TF data.11,38 In some applications, such as in single molecule tracking methods,38,41 it is essential to have a high-speed TF image collection. In contrast, for certain reference metrology applications, high-speed collection may not be necessary, but high precision is of paramount necessity.24,25 In the following sections, we discuss relative speeds and quality of TF image collection methods. 5.1.SpeedThe speed of TF image collection and image quality will usually trend in opposite directions. In this review, the image quality mostly refers to signal-to-noise ratio. Typically, higher collection speeds reduce image quality and vice versa. In the scanning-based image collection methods, TF image collection time can vary considerably depending on the microscope conditions such as exposure time, the number of TF images needed, illumination source intensity, sample type, and method of scanning. All such factors must be optimized to achieve a suitable, low-noise image in the acceptable condition. Increasing the exposure time and the number of TF images will usually increase collection time, while increasing illumination source intensity decreases it due to lesser required exposure time. A sample that returns a large scattered intensity is beneficial in reducing the exposure time and hence TF image collection time. TF collection times of the scanning methods span from a relatively slow (in the order of minutes) to a relatively high-speed (in the order of less than a millisecond). Scanning can either be performed continuously or using repeated, short, step-scans for the scanning-based TF image collection methods. In continuous-scanning approaches, the scanning part and the camera are synchronized that enables relatively high-speed TF image collections. For example, in the objective scanning method (Sec. 3.2), it is possible to continuously scan the objective back-and-forth and simultaneously record images at a relatively high-speed (200 ms41). The focus step size depends on the time gap between each exposure and the scanning speed of the objective. Even though the adaptive optics method (Sec. 3.8) is a type of continuous-scanning method, it achieves a very high-speed collection (32). Acousto-optic lens (),17 liquid lenses (),11,93 and adaptive optics ()66 can also achieve a high-speed TF image collection. Step-scan methods are relatively slow as scanning must be stopped briefly for image collection at every step, and this increases the overall TF image collection time. For example, in the stage-scanning method (Sec. 3.1), each time the stage is axially translated at a given step size, it is stopped for image collection, repeating the process until all the TF images are collected. Usually, nonscanning methods are relatively fast. For example, in MFM, TF images are collected simultaneously in one exposure (or in one image). This results in TF image collection as fast as any single image collection using a conventional microscope. Multifocal plane microscopy also can collect TF images simultaneously at a high-speed. However, the number of images is restricted to the number of times imaging beam is split. High-speed TF imaging can also be achieved using DHM. A summary of the best speeds possible to collect a set of TF images for different TF methods is presented in Table 1. 5.2.Image QualityNot all TF imaging methods produce the same quality images. In fact, a wide range of image qualities can be expected depending on the TF method and the experimental conditions. It is the opinion of the author that the best quality images can be collected relatively easily using step-scan type of TF methods (e.g., stage-scanning method), but this is at the expense of collection speed. The presence of optical tool mechanical instability and other mechanical vibrations can deteriorate the image quality. In reality, scanning-based methods are usually prone to image deterioration of this kind.34 Consequently, if careful attention is not given to these factors, the continuous-scanning methods will usually result in lower quality images. Liquid-tunable lenses and flexible membrane liquid lenses suffer from significant aberrations56 which reduce image quality. Image quality in MFM can suffer because of splitting of the primary beam into several images. As presented above, every TF method has certain advantages and disadvantages. The selection of a TF method depends on several factors, including type of data needed, image quality, applicability, speed of acquisition, cost, mechanical stability, accuracy, noise, simplicity, ease of use, and availability of the technology. Several aspects of optical microscopes have been identified to minimize degradation of optical images (e.g., laser stability, flat-field correction, camera performance, optical aberrations, noise, spectral reproducibility, lateral resolution, lens cleanliness, lens characteristics, temporal variability of signal and noise, absolute intensity calibration, and correcting field-dependent aberrations90,94–102). However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no published method to test the fidelity of a set of TF images. Two aspects are uniquely associated with TF type of data collection: (i) focus step size and (ii) sample/stage vibration (or lateral movement) during mechanical scanning. Either imprecise focus step size (including in the extracted TF images) or lateral displacement of sample is highly likely to deteriorate TF optical data. A combination of (i) and (ii) could also be presented. For example, scanning methods could have mechanical instabilities and vibration issues34 resulting in increased overall noise. If there is a mismatch between the sample stage scan axis with the optical axis along the focus direction, TF optical images appear to shift laterally32 creating a large error. Similar lateral image shift can also be observed if the aperture diaphragm is not correctly aligned with the optical axis.20 For these reasons, it is important to evaluate fidelity of the TF data. We are actively working to develop a method to test TF data fidelity. 6.ConclusionWe have presented a review of over 15 distinct TF imaging methods from the literature. There is a wide choice to select from depending on the need. As with any optical images, the set of TF images collected using any method or under any conditions needs to be tested for fidelity. We hope to present such a test in the near future. ReferencesS. W. Hell,
“Far-field optical nanoscopy,”
Single Molecule Spectroscopy in Chemistry, Physics and Biology: Nobel Symposium, 365
–398 Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
(2010). Google Scholar
R. Zenobi,
“Analytical tools for the nano world,”
Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 390
(1), 215
–221
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1640-1 Google Scholar
S. Doose,
“Trends in biological optical microscopy,”
ChemPhysChem, 9
(4), 523
–528
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1439-7641 Google Scholar
L. Schermelleh, R. Heintzmann and H. Leonhardt,
“A guide to super-resolution fluorescence microscopy,”
J. Cell Biol., 190
(2), 165
–175
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201002018 Google Scholar
W. H. Stefan et al.,
“The 2015 super-resolution microscopy roadmap,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 48
(44), 443001
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/48/44/443001 Google Scholar
M. J. Rust, M. Bates and X. Zhuang,
“Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM),”
Nat. Methods, 3 793
–796
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth929 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
E. Betzig et al.,
“Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution,”
Science, 313
(5793), 1642
–1645
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127344 Google Scholar
K. Fujita,
“Follow-up review: recent progress in the development of super-resolution optical microscopy,”
Microscopy, 65
(4), 275
–281
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/jmicro/dfw022 Google Scholar
A. von Diezmann, Y. Shechtman and W. E. Moerner,
“Three-dimensional localization of single molecules for super-resolution imaging and single-particle tracking,”
Chem. Rev., 117
(11), 7244
–7275
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00629 Google Scholar
A. Azaripour et al.,
“Three-dimensional histochemistry and imaging of human gingiva,”
Sci. Rep. U.K., 8
(1), 1647
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19685-4 Google Scholar
G. Katona et al.,
“Fast two-photon in vivo imaging with three-dimensional random-access scanning in large tissue volumes,”
Nat. Methods, 9 201
–208
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1851 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
P. Prabhat et al.,
“Simultaneous imaging of different focal planes in fluorescence microscopy for the study of cellular dynamics in three dimensions,”
IEEE Trans. NanoBiosci., 3
(4), 237
–242
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1109/TNB.2004.837899 Google Scholar
A. Tahmasbi et al.,
“Designing the focal plane spacing for multifocal plane microscopy,”
Opt. Express, 22
(14), 16706
–16721
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.016706 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
W. Göbel, B. M. Kampa and F. Helmchen,
“Imaging cellular network dynamics in three dimensions using fast 3D laser scanning,”
Nat. Methods, 4 73
–79
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth989 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
K. F. Tehrani et al.,
“Fast axial scanning for 2-photon microscopy using liquid lens technology,”
Proc. SPIE, 10070 100700Y
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2252992 Google Scholar
N. Ji, J. Freeman and S. L. Smith,
“Technologies for imaging neural activity in large volumes,”
Nat. Neurosci., 19 1154
–1164
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.4358 Google Scholar
A. Kaplan, N. Friedman and N. Davidson,
“Acousto-optic lens with very fast focus scanning,”
Opt. Lett., 26
(14), 1078
–1080
(2001). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.26.001078 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
R. Attota et al.,
“Nanoparticle size determination using optical microscopes,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 105
(16), 163105
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4900484 Google Scholar
H. Kang et al.,
“A method to determine the number of nanoparticles in a cluster using conventional optical microscopes,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 107
(10), 103106
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4930994 Google Scholar
R. K. Attota and H. Park,
“Optical microscope illumination analysis using through-focus scanning optical microscopy,”
Opt. Lett., 42
(12), 2306
–2309
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.002306 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
R. K. Attota et al.,
“Feasibility study on 3-D shape analysis of high-aspect-ratio features using through-focus scanning optical microscopy,”
Opt. Express, 24
(15), 16574
–16585
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.016574 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
R. K. Attota and H. Kang,
“Parameter optimization for through-focus scanning optical microscopy,”
Opt. Express, 24
(13), 14915
–14924
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.014915 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
R. Attota,
“Noise analysis for through-focus scanning optical microscopy,”
Opt. Lett., 41
(4), 745
–748
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.41.000745 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
R. Attota and R. G. Dixson,
“Resolving three-dimensional shape of sub-50 nm wide lines with nanometer-scale sensitivity using conventional optical microscopes,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 105
(4), 043101
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4891676 Google Scholar
R. Attota, B. Bunday and V. Vartanian,
“Critical dimension metrology by through-focus scanning optical microscopy beyond the 22 nm node,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 102
(22), 222107
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4809512 Google Scholar
A. Arceo, B. Bunday and R. Attota,
“Use of TSOM for sub-11 nm node pattern defect detection and HAR features,”
Proc. SPIE, 8681 86812G
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2013777 Google Scholar
A. Arceo et al.,
“Patterned defect and CD metrology by TSOM beyond the 22 nm node,”
Proc. SPIE, 8324 83240E
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.917236 Google Scholar
R. Attota and R. Silver,
“Nanometrology using a through-focus scanning optical microscopy method,”
Meas. Sci. Technol., 22
(2), 024002
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/22/2/024002 Google Scholar
R. Attota et al.,
“TSOM method for semiconductor metrology,”
Proc. SPIE, 7971 79710T
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.881620 Google Scholar
R. Attota, T. A. Germer and R. M. Silver,
“Through-focus scanning-optical-microscope imaging method for nanoscale dimensional analysis,”
Opt. Lett., 33
(17), 1990
–1992
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.001990 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
S.-W. Park, J. H. Lee and H. Kim,
“3D digital holographic semiconductor metrology using Fourier modal method,”
in JSAP-OSA Joint Symp.,
8a_PB2_1
(2017). Google Scholar
S. Han et al.,
“Tip/tilt-compensated through-focus scanning optical microscopy,”
Proc. SPIE, 10023 100230P
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2247807 Google Scholar
M. Ryabko et al.,
“Through-focus scanning optical microscopy (TSOM) considering optical aberrations: practical implementation,”
Opt. Express, 23
(25), 32215
–32221
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.032215 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
M. Ryabko et al.,
“Motion-free all optical inspection system for nanoscale topology control,”
Opt. Express, 22
(12), 14958
–14963
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.014958 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
S. Usha et al.,
“Through focus optical imaging technique to analyze variations in nano-scale indents,”
Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 2
(5), 18
(2013). Google Scholar
M. V. Ryabko et al.,
“Method for optical inspection of nanoscale objects based upon analysis of their defocused images and features of its practical implementation,”
Opt. Express, 21
(21), 24483
–24489
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.024483 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
S. Abrahamsson et al.,
“Fast multicolor 3D imaging using aberration-corrected multifocus microscopy,”
Nat. Methods, 10
(1), 60
–63
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2277 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
S. Abrahamsson et al.,
“Multifocus microscopy with precise color multi-phase diffractive optics applied in functional neuronal imaging,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 7
(3), 855
–869
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000855 Google Scholar
S. Abrahamsson et al.,
“Multifocus polarization microscope (MF-PolScope) for 3D polarization imaging of up to 25 focal planes simultaneously,”
Opt. Express, 23
(6), 7734
–7754
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.23.007734 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
J. M. Gineste et al.,
“Three-dimensional automated nanoparticle tracking using Mie scattering in an optical microscope,”
J. Microsc., 243
(2), 172
–178
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.2011.243.issue-2 Google Scholar
M. Minsky,
“Memoir on inventing the confocal scanning microscope,”
Scanning, 10
(4), 128
–138
(1988). https://doi.org/10.1002/sca.v10:4 Google Scholar
W. E. Ortyn et al.,
“Extended depth of field imaging for high speed cell analysis,”
Cytom. Part A, 71A
(4), 215
–231
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4930 Google Scholar
R. Attota et al.,
“Optical critical dimension measurement and illumination analysis using the through-focus focus metric: art. no. 61520K,”
Proc. SPIE, 6152 K1520
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.656421 Google Scholar
R. Attota et al.,
“Application of through-focus focus-metric analysis in high resolution optical metrology,”
Proc. SPIE, 5752 1441
–1449
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.621106 Google Scholar
R. M. Silver et al.,
“High-resolution optical overlay metrology,”
Proc. SPIE, 5375 78
–95
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.539028 Google Scholar
R. M. Silver et al.,
“Scatterfield microscopy for extending the limits of image-based optical metrology,”
Appl. Opt., 46
(20), 4248
–4257
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.46.004248 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
B. M. Barnes et al.,
“Optical volumetric inspection of sub-20 nm patterned defects with wafer noise,”
Proc. SPIE, 9050 905016
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2048231 Google Scholar
R. K. Attota,
“Step beyond Kohler illumination analysis for far-field quantitative imaging: angular illumination asymmetry (ANILAS) maps,”
Opt. Express, 24
(20), 22616
–22627
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.022616 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
R. Attota and R. Silver,
“Optical microscope angular illumination analysis,”
Opt. Express, 20
(6), 6693
–6702
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.006693 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
E. A. Patterson and M. P. Whelan,
“Optical signatures of small nanoparticles in a conventional microscope,”
Small, 4
(10), 1703
–1706
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.v4:10 Google Scholar
E. J. Botcherby et al.,
“An optical technique for remote focusing in microscopy,”
Opt. Commun., 281
(4), 880
–887
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2007.10.007 JOCODG 0173-4911 Google Scholar
A. Jesacher, C. Roider and M. Ritsch-Marte,
“Enhancing diffractive multi-plane microscopy using colored illumination,”
Opt Express, 21
(9), 11150
–11161
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.21.011150 Google Scholar
G. C. Knollman, J. L. S. Bellin and J. L. Weaver,
“Variable-focus liquid-filled hydroacoustic lens,”
J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 49
(1), 253
–261
(1971). https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1912324 Google Scholar
C. Friese et al.,
“Materials, effects and components for tunable microoptics,”
IEEJ Trans. Electr. Electron. Eng., 2
(3), 232
–248
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.20138 Google Scholar
P. P. Zhao, C. Ataman and H. Zappe,
“Miniaturized variable-focus objective employing a liquid-filled tunable aspherical lens,”
Opt. Eng., 56
(10), 103110
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.56.10.103110 Google Scholar
L. H. Wang, H. Oku and M. Ishikawa,
“Paraxial ray solution for liquid-filled variable focus lenses,”
Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 56
(12), 122501
(2017). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.56.122501 Google Scholar
L. Wang et al.,
“Variable-focus liquid lens integrated with a planar electromagnetic actuator,”
Micromachines, 7
(10), 190
(2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi7100190 Google Scholar
W. X. Zhao et al.,
“Variable-focus cylindrical liquid lens array,”
Proc. SPIE, 8769 87690Y
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2021322 Google Scholar
P. Pokorný et al.,
“Deformation of a prestressed liquid lens membrane,”
Appl. Opt., 56
(34), 9368
–9376
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.009368 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
H. Ren and S.-T. Wu,
“Variable-focus liquid lens,”
Opt. Express, 15
(10), 5931
–5936
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.005931 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
J.-W. Du, X.-Y. Wang and D. Liang,
“Bionic optical imaging system with aspheric solid-liquid mixed variable-focus lens,”
Opt. Eng., 55 023105
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.55.2.023105 Google Scholar
H. Ren and S. T. Wu,
“Variable-focus liquid lens by changing aperture,”
Appl. Phys. Lett., 86
(21), 211107
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1935749 Google Scholar
D. Koyama, R. Isago and K. Nakamura,
“Compact, high-speed variable-focus liquid lens using acoustic radiation force,”
Opt. Express, 18
(24), 25158
–25169
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.025158 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
P. S. Salter, Z. Iqbal and M. J. Booth,
“Analysis of the three-dimensional focal positioning capability of adaptive optic elements,”
Int. J. Optomechatronics, 7
(1), 1
–14
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/15599612.2012.758791 Google Scholar
M. Žurauskas et al.,
“Rapid adaptive remote focusing microscope for sensing of volumetric neural activity,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 8
(10), 4369
–4379
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.004369 Google Scholar
S. Dong et al.,
“Aperture-scanning Fourier ptychography for 3D refocusing and super-resolution macroscopic imaging,”
Opt. Express, 22
(11), 13586
–13599
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.013586 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
T. F. Holekamp, D. Turaga and T. E. Holy,
“Fast three-dimensional fluorescence imaging of activity in neural populations by objective-coupled planar illumination microscopy,”
Neuron, 57
(5), 661
–672
(2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.01.011 Google Scholar
R. M. Power and J. Huisken,
“A guide to light-sheet fluorescence microscopy for multiscale imaging,”
Nat. Methods, 14 360
–373
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4224 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
J. Huisken et al.,
“Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy,”
Science, 305
(5686), 1007
–1009
(2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100035 Google Scholar
A.-K. Gustavsson et al.,
“3D single-molecule super-resolution microscopy with a tilted light sheet,”
Nat. Commun., 9
(1), 123
(2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02563-4 Google Scholar
B. Weigelin, G.-J. Bakker and P. Friedl,
“Third harmonic generation microscopy of cells and tissue organization,”
J. Cell Sci., 129
(2), 245
–255
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.152272 Google Scholar
T. Lagerweij et al.,
“Optical clearing and fluorescence deep-tissue imaging for 3D quantitative analysis of the brain tumor microenvironment,”
Angiogenesis, 20
(4), 533
–546
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-017-9565-6 Google Scholar
M. Zhang et al.,
“Three-dimensional light field microscope based on a lenslet array,”
Opt. Commun., 403
(Suppl. C), 133
–142
(2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.07.026 JOCODG 0173-4911 Google Scholar
M. Levoy et al.,
“Light field microscopy,”
ACM Trans. Graphics, 25
(3), 924
–934
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1145/1141911 Google Scholar
L. J. Allen and M. P. Oxley,
“Phase retrieval from series of images obtained by defocus variation,”
Opt. Commun., 199
(1), 65
–75
(2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(01)01556-5 JOCODG 0173-4911 Google Scholar
Z. Jingshan et al.,
“Transport of Intensity phase imaging by intensity spectrum fitting of exponentially spaced defocus planes,”
Opt. Express, 22
(9), 10661
–10674
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.010661 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
B. Xue et al.,
“Transport of intensity phase imaging from multiple intensities measured in unequally-spaced planes,”
Opt. Express, 19
(21), 20244
–20250
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.020244 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
G. Popescu, Quantitative Phase Imaging of Cells and Tissues, McGraw-Hill, New York
(2011). Google Scholar
S. S. Kou and C. J. R. Sheppard,
“Imaging in digital holographic microscopy,”
Opt. Express, 15
(21), 13640
–13648
(2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.15.013640 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
M. Matrecano, M. Paturzo and P. Ferraro,
“Extended focus imaging in digital holographic microscopy: a review,”
Opt. Eng., 53 112317
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.53.11.112317 Google Scholar
T. Colomb et al.,
“Extended depth-of-focus by digital holographic microscopy,”
Opt. Lett., 35
(11), 1840
–1842
(2010). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.35.001840 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
J. P. Ryle et al.,
“Calibration of a digital in-line holographic microscopy system: depth of focus and bioprocess analysis,”
Appl. Opt., 52
(7), C78
–C87
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.52.000C78 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
P. Ferraro et al.,
“Extended focused image in microscopy by digital holography,”
Opt. Express, 13
(18), 6738
–6749
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPEX.13.006738 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
J. Rosen and G. Brooker,
“Fresnel incoherent correlation holography (FINCH): a review of research,”
in Advanced Optical Technologies,
151
(2012). Google Scholar
P. Ferraro et al.,
“Compensation of the inherent wave front curvature in digital holographic coherent microscopy for quantitative phase-contrast imaging,”
Appl. Opt., 42
(11), 1938
–1946
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.001938 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
M. E. Durst, G. Zhu and C. Xu,
“Simultaneous spatial and temporal focusing for axial scanning,”
Opt. Express, 14
(25), 12243
–12254
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.14.012243 OPEXFF 1094-4087 Google Scholar
A. Dubois et al.,
“High-resolution full-field optical coherence tomography with a Linnik microscope,”
Appl. Opt., 41
(4), 805
–812
(2002). https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.41.000805 APOPAI 0003-6935 Google Scholar
E. Beaurepaire et al.,
“Full-field optical coherence microscopy,”
Opt. Lett., 23
(4), 244
–246
(1998). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.23.000244 OPLEDP 0146-9592 Google Scholar
R. M. Zucker and O. Price,
“Evaluation of confocal microscopy system performance,”
Cytometry, 44
(4), 273
–294
(2001). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0320 Google Scholar
T. J. Gould, S. T. Hess and J. Bewersdorf,
“Optical nanoscopy: from acquisition to analysis,”
Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 14
(1), 231
–254
(2012). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150025 Google Scholar
F. Huang et al.,
“Ultra-high resolution 3D imaging of whole cells,”
Cell, 166
(4), 1028
–1040
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.016 Google Scholar
H. Oku and M. Ishikawa,
“Rapid liquid variable-focus lens with 2-ms response,”
in IEEE Lasers and Electro-Optics Society Annual Meeting-LEOS,
947
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/LEOS.2006.279180 Google Scholar
R. Attota et al.,
“A new method to enhance overlay tool performance,”
Proc. SPIE, 5038 428
–436
(2003). https://doi.org/10.1117/12.488481 Google Scholar
R. M. Zucker,
“Quality assessment of confocal microscopy slide-based systems: Instability,”
Cytom. Part A, 69A
(7), 677
–690
(2006). https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1552-4930 Google Scholar
K. M. Kedziora et al.,
“Method of calibration of a fluorescence microscope for quantitative studies,”
J. Microsc., 244
(1), 101
–111
(2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.2011.244.issue-1 Google Scholar
J. C. Waters and T. Wittmann,
“Quantitative Imaging in Cell Biology,”
Methods in Cell Biology, 123 Elsevier(2014). Google Scholar
M. Halter et al.,
“An automated protocol for performance benchmarking a widefield fluorescence microscope,”
Cytom. Part A, 85a
(11), 978
–985
(2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.22519 Google Scholar
K. I. Mortensen and H. Flyvbjerg,
“Calibration-on-the-spot”: how to calibrate an EMCCD camera from its images,”
Sci. Rep., 7 46883
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep46883 Google Scholar
A. von Diezmann et al.,
“Correcting field-dependent aberrations with nanoscale accuracy in three-dimensional single-molecule localization microscopy,”
Optica, 2
(11), 985
–993
(2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.2.000985 OPTIC8 2334-2536 Google Scholar
K. M. Douglass et al.,
“Super-resolution imaging of multiple cells by optimized flat-field epi-illumination,”
Nat. Photonics, 10
(11), 705
–708
(2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.200 NPAHBY 1749-4885 Google Scholar
F. Huang et al.,
“Video-rate nanoscopy using sCMOS camera-specific single-molecule localization algorithms,”
Nat. Methods, 10
(7), 653
–658
(2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2488 EISSN 1548-7091 Google Scholar
|