Open Access
27 January 2024 Wide dynamic range measurement of blood flow in vivo using laser speckle contrast imaging
Hong Li Liu, Yuan Yuan, Li Han, Yong Bi, Wen Yuan Yu, Yang Yu
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Significance

Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is a real-time wide-field technique that is applied to visualize blood flow in biomedical applications. However, there is currently a lack of relevant research to demonstrate that it can measure velocities over a wide dynamic range (WDR), which is critical for monitoring much higher and more pulsatile blood flow in larger size myocardial vessels, such as the coronary artery bypass graft, and visualizing the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial blood flow perfusion in cardiac surgery.

Aim

We aim to demonstrate that the LSCI technique enables measuring velocities over a WDR from phantom experiments to animal experiments. In addition, LSCI is preliminarily applied to imaging myocardial blood flow distribution in vivo on rabbits.

Approach

Phantom and animal experiments are performed to verify that the LSCI method has the ability to measure blood velocities over a wide range. Our method is also validated by transit time flow measurement, which is the gold standard for blood flow measurement in cardiac surgery.

Results

Our method is demonstrated to measure the blood flow over a wide range from 0.2 to 635 mm/s. To validate the phantom results, the varying blood flow rate from 0 to 320 mm/s is detected in the rat carotid artery. Additionally, our technique also obtains blood flow maps of different myocardial vessels, such as superficial large/small veins, veins surrounded by fat, and myocardial deeper arteriole.

Conclusions

Our study has the potential to visualize the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery bypass grafting, which would be of great benefit for future research in the life sciences and clinical medicine.

1.

Introduction

Visualization of myocardial blood flow varying on spatial and temporal scales is crucial for studying the pathogenesis of coronary heart disease. In particular, for the quality control of surgeries, such as coronary artery bypass grafting, there is an urgent need to constantly image the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial blood flow perfusion.13 Currently, the transit time flow measurement (TTFM) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography are usually adopted to monitor the myocardial blood flow, but both either fail in sufficient spatial sampling or cannot perform dynamic real-time imaging. Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) is an optical technique that quantifies the significant correlation between the characteristics of laser speckle and the flow rate of the light-scattering particles (red blood cells), defined as the contrast-to-blood flow relationship. Thanks to the high spatio-temporal resolution and full-field view, LSCI has attracted widespread attention in the academic community.49 The research work currently focuses on imaging blood flow in the retina, skin, and cerebral cortex and has been reported in Refs. 1011.12.13.14. In addition, a handheld LSCI device was developed, bringing convenience for both patients and clinical staff.1518

However, unlike the arteries in the retina, skin, and cerebral cortex,19,20 the coronary artery is much larger, and its blood flow is much faster and pulsatile because the heart works as a pump, performing the alternating activities of contraction and relaxation to provide energy for the blood circulation.21,22 Thus, an LSCI technique that meets the requirements for myocardial perfusion measurements that can measure the blood flow rate over a wide dynamic range (WDR) is a fundamental issue. As is known, the foundation of LSCI is the link between the speckle contrast (SC) and dynamics of light scattering particles. The mathematics describing this relationship depends on several factors: (1) the field correlation function g1(τ), the form of which is defined by the scattering regime (single or multiple) and the motion of the particles (ordered or unordered);5,2326 (2) the static scattering;13,25,27 and (3) the coherence parameter β.25,26 Based on these factors, Liu et al.25 derived SC models for the different cases of multiple scattering unordered motion and single scattering ordered motion and analyzed how these factors affect the accuracy of blood flow estimation. Nevertheless, whether the newly derived LSCI models could measure the wide blood flow rate range and be applied to the myocardial vessels has not been studied.

Guided by the above experimental results,23,25,26 we choose the SOn=2 (single scattering with ordered motion, where n=2 denotes n in the formula g1(τ)=exp((τ/τc)n)) LSCI model together with the precomputed coherent parameter β and the fraction of dynamic scattering ρ to derive the blood flow.19 We should notice, however, that different from the dynamic scattering ρ calculation in Ref. 19, the speckle patterns are recorded with a high frame rate to circumvent the vibration noise, which is necessary for WDR measurement of blood flow. A phantom experiment is designed to verify its ability to measure the blood flow rate over a WDR. Then, experiments on a rat are performed to monitor the blood flow changes with its carotid artery ligated. The results are validated by TTFM. Finally, we preliminarily apply the WDR-LSCI method to myocardial blood flow imaging in vivo on a rabbit heart under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

2.

Methods

2.1.

Spatial Resolution

It is assumed that the speckle image sample statistics faithfully represent the true statistics of the speckle ensemble. This can be so only if the speckle pattern is spatially sampled at or above the spatial Nyquist rate, i.e., the speckle size is at least twice the size of a pixel. Because the normalized spatial autocorrelation function g2(Δx) of the speckle image is the point spread function of the optical system, the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of g2(Δx) is taken as the speckle size, also defined as the spatial resolution.2731

Experimentally, the normalized spatial autocorrelation function g2(Δx) is measured using

Eq. (1)

g2(Δx)=I(x,y)I(x+Δx,y)I(x,y)I(x+Δx,y),
where I(x,y) and I(x+Δx,y) represent the intensity at positions (x,y) and (x+Δx,y) of the speckle pattern. The value of the FWHM/speckle size is obtained through a Gaussian fit.

2.2.

Choosing an LSCI Model

LSCI quantifies the SC and blood flow relationship through the intensity autocorrelation function g2(τ). Briefly, the SC K is given as

Eq. (2)

K=σII¯,
where σI and I¯ are the standard deviation and mean intensity, respectively, over the pixels in the region of interest (ROI). Because we focus on larger blood vessels (>110  μm), we choose the single scattering with ordered motion SOn=2 of the field correlation function to derive the blood flow characterized by the blood flow index (BFI), defined as x=T/τc, where T is the exposure time and τc is the decorrelation time.26 This BFI is calculated from the SC Kt, which can be determined experimentally and is given as25,26

Eq. (3)

Kt=β0.5{ρ2e2x2+2πerf(2x)x12x2+2ρ(1ρ)ex2+πerf(x)x1x2}0.5.

Here, erf(x) is the error function and is defined as

Eq. (4)

erf(z)=2π0zet2dt,
and ρ=IfIf+Is is the ratio of dynamic scattering, where Is=EsEs* is the time-averaged intensity of the statically scattered light, If=EfEf* is the time-averaged intensity of the fluctuating dynamically scattered light, Es is the static light field, Ef is the dynamically scattered light field, and β is a normalization factor depending on the speckle size, pixel size, polarization, and coherence effects.

2.3.

BFI Calculation

2.3.1.

Parameter β

The value of β is determined by the experimental setup and is typically assumed to be homogeneous across the field of view. It is a normalization factor that accounts for speckle averaging due to the speckle size and detector size mismatch, polarization, and coherence effects. The spatial speckle model, given in Eq. (5), shows that, when x tends to zero, the spatial speckle variance K will tend to β. Thus, β is obtained by computing the local spatial speckle variance in the corresponding spatial windows with a slow enough flow rate and short enough exposure time. When the speckle patterns that meet the above demands are recorded, we first calculate the SC K with Eq. (2) on 7×7  pixel sliding windows and derive a SC matrix. Then, a K value is obtained by averaging the SC matrix. To improve the signal-to-noise ratio, 100 speckle patterns were chosen for each process. Finally, β was obtained through 1nKn¯2 (n=100). The spatial SC given by the SOn=2 spatial LSCI model is19,25,26

Eq. (5)

Ks=β0.5{ρ2e2x2+2πerf(2x)x12x2+2ρ(1ρ)ex2+πerf(x)x1x2+(1ρ)2}0.5.

2.3.2.

Ratio of the dynamic scattering ρ

Typically, the speckle patterns are composed of both dynamic and stationary speckles. Although the intensity of the stationary speckles does not fluctuate in the time domain, their spatial distribution introduces a nonergodic spatial variance when the spatial SC is calculated. The statistically scattered light from tissues seriously degrades the accuracy of the flow rate estimation. Combining Eqs. (3) and (5), the ratio of the dynamic scattered photons is calculated as

Eq. (6)

ρ=1Ks2Kt2β.

2.3.3.

Blood flow index

The procedure for deriving the BFI is shown in Fig. 1. First, the system parameter β and the proportions of the dynamic scattering ρ are derived. Second, we obtain a series of SC values K of the speckle patterns scattered from different blood flow rates. Then, we calculate the BFI (T/τc) from Eq. (3). Additionally, it is essential that the speckle patterns are recorded with a high frame rate.

Fig. 1

Calculation of BFI (T/τc).

JBO_29_1_016009_f001.png

2.4.

Transit Time Flow Measurement

The TTFM (Transonic, TS 420)) is used as a reference method to measure the blood flow rate. The blood flow volume detected through TTFM is acquired and saved with a National Instrument (NI) data acquisition card together with the customized LabVIEW program. TTFM is based on the fact that the time required for ultrasound to pass through blood is slightly longer upstream (tu) than downstream (td). The flow volume Q is

Eq. (7)

Q=Cons×(tutd),
where Cons is automeasured by the TTFM device. Two ultrasound transducers fire ultrasound pulses in opposite directions through the bloodstream. Both pulses travel the same distance, but due to the bloodstream, the time from transmission to when the pulse is received will be different. The difference in transit time is recorded by the system and is directly proportional to the blood volume flowing through the measurement area (mL/min).

2.5.

Animal Sample Preparation

All experimental procedures were approved by the Experimental Animal Management Ordinance of Beijing, China, and carried out in accordance with the guidelines for the humane care of animals. After shaving and disinfecting the ventral surface of the neck with iodine, the rat was placed on a heating pad. The common carotid arteries were accessed via a midline prelaryngeal incision and cleanly dissected from the sympathetic and vagus nerves. The rat was anesthetized by inhalation of 2% to 3% isoflurane in oxygen through a nose cone. The hair on the thorax was shaved, and the animal was fixed on the experimental platform. A CPB model for a rabbit with cardioplegic arrest using aortic cross clamping and cold crystalloid cardioplegia was established to remove the noise from the dynamic speckle. The sternum was divided in midline, the thymus was retracted, the aorta was isolated, and a Prolene 6-0 purse-string suture was placed in the right atrium. After systemic anticoagulation with heparin (300  IU/kg given intravenously), the proximal aortic cannulated with an 18G trocar. A venous drainage tube (inner diameter 4 mm) was placed in the right atrium. The aortic and right atrial cannulas were connected to the perfusion circuit. The distal aorta was ligated with an aortic cross-clamp and cold (4°C) cardioplegic solution infused into the aortic root.

3.

Experimental Setup

The experimental setup is illustrated in Fig. 2(a). A laser diode of wavelength 785 nm was placed in a mount with a thermoelectric cooling stage (LDM56, Thorlabs, United States). The laser beam was homogenized by a light pipe before illuminating the sample. Figure 2(b) shows some details of the optical system. The imaging system consisted of a high-speed camera (Mikrotron EoSens® 4CXP, 2336×1728 @ 7  μm), a bandpass filter (FL780-10, Thorlabs), a polarizer (LPNIRE100-B, Thorlabs), a tube lens (f=100  mm, AC508-100-B-ML, Thorlabs, United States), and an objective lens (Nikon CF Plan NA0.13 5×). Its magnification was about 2×, and the speckle size was around 4×4 camera pixels. A high acquisition frame rate card (KAYA Instrument, Israel) was used to record the dynamic scattering light.

Fig. 2

(a) Schematic of the experimental setup, including (b) the illumination module: a laser diode of wavelength 785 nm (L785H1, Thorlabs) was collimated and filtered by M1, M2, and SF. Then the laser beam was homogenized by a LP and illuminated on the sample; imaging module, consisting of microscopic objective (Nikon CF Plan NA0.13 5×), lens (AC508-100-B-ML, Thorlabs), polarizer (LPNIRE100-B,Thorlabs), filter (FL780-10, Thorlabs), camera (Mikrotron EoSens® 4CXP, 2336×1728 @ 7  μm), and step motor used to drive the blood flow rate in the phantom experiment. (c) Process of rat carotid artery ligation for verifying the LSCI technique, which enables the measurement of blood flow in wide range in vivo. Simultaneously, the varying blood flow rate was measured by the TTFM. (d) In vivo experiment on rabbit. M1/M2, mirror; SF, spatial filter; L1, lens, f1=6.24  mm; L2/L3, lens, f=75  mm; LP, light pipe (3  mm×3  mm×50  mm); UIS, uniform illuminating spot.

JBO_29_1_016009_f002.png

A phantom experiment, with a microfluidic cavity (ibidi, μ-Slide I Luer, Germany) filled with rabbit blood driven by a step motor, was employed to simulate a myocardial blood vessel at different flow rates. A syringe fixed onto the step motor was connected with the inlet of the microfluidic cavity through a silicone tube. The outlet of the cavity was drained into a container. The inner areas of the syringe and the microfluidic cavity were 254 and 2  mm2, respectively; thus the flow rate in the latter was 127 times that of the former. In the animal experiment, we first constructed a rat (female 250 g) carotid artery ligation using two spiral micrometers fixed onto the sample platform, as shown in Fig. 2(c). At first, the two spiral micrometers were modulated to make the two end faces adjacent to the rat carotid artery, and a 0.7 mm vascular flow probe was applied to the vessel. We rotated the spiral micrometer forward until the blood flow in the carotid artery was compressed to zero and then rotated it in the opposite direction, during which the blood flow was measured by our method and the TTFM (Transonic, TS420). Then the common carotid arteries were removed and fixed in 10% buffered formalin. After 24 h of post fixation, the arteries were dehydrated, embedded in paraffin, and cut into 6  μm long sections. Standard haematoxylin-eosin staining was performed on the sections. Next, a New Zealand white rabbit (female, 6 months old) was operated upon to construct a CPB in vivo, and the BFI in different regions on the myocardial surface was derived.

4.

Results and Discussion

4.1.

Phantom Experiment

To demonstrate that our WDR-LSCI method has the capability to measure a wide range of velocities, we designed a phantom experiment. A stack of raw speckle images of the phantom was acquired with an exposure time of 49  μs and a frame rate of 20,000 Hz. A 7×7 sliding window was used to calculate the spatial SC maps, and the temporal contrast Kt images were calculated at each pixel over 1000 consecutive frames. The system parameter β was estimated by calculating the spatial speckle variance Ks for 100 speckle patterns that scatter from the diffuser within 4.9 ms. The β (=Ks2) of our setup was derived to be 0.48. Next, we set the blood flow in the microfluidic cavity to be zero, i.e., the red blood cells were allowed to undergo natural Brownian motion, and the speckle images were recorded. Using Eq. (6), ρ was calculated to be 0.93. With β and ρ determined, the BFI value was extracted by interpolation using the contrast-to-blood flow relationship of Eq. (3).

Figure 3(a) is a theoretical simulation of the SC K versus the BFI (T/τc) on a logarithmic scale with 7% static scattering. The region enclosed by the blue dashed lines is enlarged in the inset, in which the experimental data (red dots), shown on a linear scale, are the averaged values of three groups of data as the step motor was driven at varying rates from 0.2 to 8  mm/s. The corresponding flow rate in the microfluidic cavity varied from 25.4 to 635  mm/s. The values of K in the simulated K-BFI plot agree well with the experimental data. Figure 3(b) shows the linear relationship between the BFI (T/τc) and the blood flow rate from 25.4 to 635  mm/s. The black squares correspond to the experimental data, and the red line is the fitted curve, plotted as BFI=1.38+0.031v, where v is the absolute blood flow (mm/s). The results indicate that β and ρ are critical parameters for deducing the BFI, and their accurate determination can greatly improve both the linearity and WDR.13,19,25,26 Conventionally, when it comes to realizing a WDR for a flow rate with LSCI, the multi-exposure technique in which the camera exposure time range has been clearly given has been mentioned.13,14 However, for obtaining the blood flow rate, compared with 15 exposure times from 50  μs to 80 ms with a standard multi-exposure speckle imaging (MESI) and 6 exposure times from 1 to 20 ms with a synthetic MESI implementation, in our LSCI setup, we only used 50 ms (for 1000 speckle images with 50  μs exposure time).

Fig. 3

Theoretical simulation of the SC K versus the BFI (T/τc) with 7% static scattering and (inset) experimental data (red dots); blue solid lines are the simulated curve. (b) The BFI versus driving blood flow rate. Square dots, experimental values; red solid line, fitted curve (BFI=1.38+0.031v).

JBO_29_1_016009_f003.png

4.2.

Animal Experiment Validation

To support the phantom results, we compared blood flow changes during carotid artery ligation estimated with both LSCI (BFI: T/τc) and TTFM. Before performing the animal experiment, the normalized spatial autocorrelation function g2(Δx) versus Δx was calculated using Eq. (1), in which the intensities at a fixed pixel point (x,y) are convoluted with those of the other speckles at (x+Δx,y) for each speckle pattern. As shown in Fig. 4(a), a series of speckle images are recorded in the inset, and the 31  μm FWHM of g2(Δx) of the peak gives the resolution of the system.

Fig. 4

(a) Second-order autocorrelation g2(ΔX) as a function of distance with 2000 measurements. Inset: the speckle patterns recorded to calculate the spatial resolution. The FWHM corresponding to the spatial resolution or speckle size is 31  μm. Blue dots, experimental data; solid curve, Gaussian fit. (b)–(g) During the process of the rat carotid artery being ligated and back to normal, its blood flow map, estimated by BFI (T/τc), varies on the spatial and temporal scales at times 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 s. Color bar: red represents larger blood flow rate, and blue indicates lower flow rate.

JBO_29_1_016009_f004.png

Figure 2(c) illustrates the experimental setup that we constructed to perform a rat carotid artery ligation. The micrometer was rotated forward until the blood flow of the carotid artery was compressed to zero and then rotated backward, during which both the speckle data and the blood volume were simultaneously monitored by LSCI and TTFM. The ratio dynamic scattering from the carotid artery ρ was measured to be 0.98. From Figs. 4(b)4(g), we can see that the blood flow rate map of the rat carotid artery characterized by BFI decreases and then becomes normal again, corresponding to the BFI values in Fig. 5 at times 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 s. The color bar value, i.e., BFI value, is deduced to range from 0 to 30. Red represents a higher blood flow, and blue indicates a lower flow rate. In Fig. 5, the black/red dots and lines represent the results measured by LSCI and TTFM, respectively. The blood flow measured with both methods at first fluctuates around a constant, then slows down to an extremely low value, and then rises. Compared with TTFM, LSCI performs better in line with the vessel unbinding process and has a higher sensitivity. During the period from 12 to 15 s when the carotid artery was gradually loosened, the BFI was 4.22, 12.73, 16.38, and 17.71, and the results measured by TTFM sharply increased, resulting in some loss of detail.

Fig. 5

Blood flow changes during carotid artery ligation, estimated with LSCI (black dots and line) and TTFM (red dots and line).

JBO_29_1_016009_f005.png

To further deduce the blood flow rate from TTFM, the diameter of the rat carotid artery was measured. A segment of the artery sample was fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde, then trimmed, dehydrated, embedded, sliced, dyed, and sealed. Finally, qualified samples were chosen through microscopic inspection. First, the panoramic slice scanner (3DHISTECH, Hungary, PANNORAMIC) scans and images the tissue slice. Then, the scanning software (3DHISTECH, Hungary, CaseViewer2.4) and analysis software (Media Cybemetics, United States, Image-Pro Plus 6.0) are used to measure the diameter of the blood vessel. As shown in the inset of Fig. 6, the inner diameter of the rat carotid artery (354.6  μm) is the average diameter measured in the red area by the software (Media Cybemetics, United States, Image-Pro Plus 6.0). The blood flow rate (blood volume/inner area/s) during the ligation process is shown in Fig. 6, where the blood flow volume from 0 to 1.8472  mL/min corresponds to the flow rate of 0 to 320  mm/s. Compared with TTFM, LSCI not only measures the blood flow rate over a WDR, but also has a higher sensitivity. Additionally, LSCI obtains a wide-field two-dimensional blood flow rate in a noncontact way, which can be applied in observing spatio-temporal changes of the blood flow rate in the ROI, especially in the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial blood flow perfusion.

Fig. 6

Relation between blood flow rate and blood volume in rat carotid artery. Inset: rat carotid artery slice. The averaged inner diameter is 0.3546 mm, which is measured by the software in the red area.

JBO_29_1_016009_f006.png

4.3.

Preliminary Application of WDR-LSCI Method in Myocardial Blood Flow Imaging

If an LSCI device could monitor blood flow over a wide range, its function would be greatly expanded. Specifically, it could be applied to imaging myocardial blood flow distribution, which would benefit visualization of the spatio-temporal evolution of the myocardial perfusion and provide important information for studying the pathogenesis and surgery of coronary heart diseases. Here, we preliminarily apply our WDR-LSCI method to myocardial blood flow imaging. Irregular motion artifacts from the heart beating and ventilator do significantly affect the measurement accuracy of the myocardial blood flow rate in our LSCI method. Chizari et al.17 proposed a model based on the optical Doppler effect to predict SC drop as an indication of motion artifacts. However, the main focus of our paper is the WDR measurable by LSCI, with the possibility of its application to myocardial perfusion imaging in vivo. Thus, in our experiment, we utilized a CPB model for a rabbit with cardioplegic arrest and a high-speed camera to circumvent motion artifacts. The regions of interest include large and small veins, as well as veins surrounded by fat and myocardial arteriole, the diameter of which, marked by a black arrow, is 1178, 168, 140, and 104  μm, as shown in Fig. 7. The vessels in the black box are the raw vessel images illuminated by white light and the corresponding BFI map as deduced by SOn=2 LSCI together with coherent parameter β (=0.48) and dynamic scattering fraction ρ. We should notice, however, that, unlike the simulation and phantom results, the ρ in the vessel of the four regions needs to be calculated separately because the optical properties of turbid media across the four regions marked by black boxes are nonergodic. We chose 20×20  pixels marked by the blue boxes to deduce ρ to be 0.965, 0.992, 0.985, and 0.971. From Fig. 7, it is clear that WDR-LSCI can provide good images of the myocardial blood flow distribution. Indeed, Padmanaban et al.32 found that there is a consistent change in the ρ factor as the channel diameter increases, i.e., increasing the tube diameter causes a higher drop in the SC for a certain volumetric flux. There are two reasons for the ρ values not being consistent with the results of Padmanaban et al.32: (1) The heart of a rabbit is small, and its surface is not flat. We have to translate or tilt the LSCI system to focus on the ROI, which leads to variation in the coherent parameter β. (ii) The optical properties of vessels in the four ROIs are all different; for example, because the scattering coefficient of the fat is larger than that of myocardial tissue, the exposure time has to be reduced when imaging the ROI in Fig. 7(c); the myocardial arteriole is located deeper, so the exposure time has to be longer. These changes would affect the value of β. In this work, we simply assume β to be invariant when calculating ρ, so the ρ values here do not increase or decrease with the vessel diameter.

Fig. 7

BFI (T/τc) maps of different myocardial vessels corresponding to the region in the black box with individual dynamic scattering fractions ρ that are calculated in the region enclosed by a blue square: (a) large veins with a diameter of about 1178  μm and ρ=0.965; (b) small veins with a diameter of about 168  μm and ρ=0.992; (c) veins surrounded by fat with a diameter of about 140  μm and ρ=0.985; and (d) myocardial arteriole with a diameter of about 104  μm and ρ=0.971.

JBO_29_1_016009_f007.png

5.

Conclusion

We have verified the ability of the SOn=2 LSCI method in measuring blood flow in WDR from phantom experiments to animal experiments. First, the coherent parameter β was estimated by calculating local spatial speckle variance with a stationary diffuser. Second, the fraction of dynamic scattering ρ was extracted by the spatial and temporal SC. Finally, the BFI (T/τc) map was obtained by the interpolation algorithm. In the phantom experiment, the full blood in the microfluidic cavity was driven by the step motor. The WDR-LSCI method was demonstrated to measure the blood flow rate up to 635  mm/s, which is the highest measurable flow rate by laser speckle method, to the best of our knowledge. To validate the phantom results, the WDR-LSCI model was applied to the rat carotid artery and compared with the TTFM, with the blood flow being controlled by two spiral micrometers. The varying blood flow rate from 0 to 320  mm/s was detected in the rat carotid artery. Furthermore, we preliminarily applied the WDR-LSCI method to myocardial blood flow imaging in the regions of interest, including larger veins, smaller veins, veins surrounded by fat, and myocardial arteriole, and clear BFI maps were obtained.

In conclusion, the WDR-LSCI method with coherent parameter β and fraction of dynamic scattering ρ was demonstrated to possess excellent performances with the following results: (1) it had the ability to measure the high blood flow rate to 635  mm/s; (2) it had a superior performance in measuring the blood flow rate compared to the gold standard (TTFM), i.e., had a higher sensitivity and could obtain a wide-field, high-precision blood flow rate map in the non-contact way; (3) it enabled imaging of the regional myocardial blood flow distribution in vivo. These results provide significant guidance for future biomedical studies of high spatio-temporal resolution imaging and the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial perfusion. In future work, we intend to address the motion artifacts caused by cardiac quasi periodic motion and respiration, as well as to detect the location of the stenosis,33,34 which is a critical step in quantitatively monitoring the spatio-temporal evolution of myocardial perfusion in the beating heart in vivo before and after coronary artery bypass grafting.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Code and Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this article are not publicly available due to privacy. They can be requested from the author at yyuan@mail.ipc.ac.cn.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62205350), Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of special funding support (Grant No. YGLX202322), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82070364), Beijing Hospitals Authority’s Ascent Plan (Grant No. DFL20220605), and the special project of Central Government Guiding Local Science and Technology Development in Beijing 2020 (Grant No. Z20111000430000).

References

1. 

M. S. Uva et al., “Guidelines on myocardial revascularization,” Eur. Heart J., 25 4 –90 https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394 EHJODF 0195-668X (2018). Google Scholar

2. 

L. D. Hillis et al., “ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines,” Circulation, 124 (23), e652 –735 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823b5fee CIRCAZ 0009-7322 (2011). Google Scholar

3. 

L Paluszkiewicz et al., “Myocardial perfusion correlates with improvement of systolic function of the left ventricle after CABG. Dobutamine echocardiography and Tc-99m-MIBI SPECT study,” Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg., 21 (1), 32 –35 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-7940(01)01078-8 (2002). Google Scholar

4. 

D. A. Boas et al., “Laser speckle contrast imaging in biomedical optics,” J. Biomed. Opt., 15 (1), 011109 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3285504 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2010). Google Scholar

5. 

A. Fercher et al., “Flow visualization by means of single-exposure speckle photography,” Opt. Commun., 37 326 –330 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4018(81)90428-4 OPCOB8 0030-4018 (1981). Google Scholar

6. 

A. K. Dunn et al., “Dynamic imaging of cerebral blood flow using laser speckle,” J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 21 195 –201 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200103000-00002 (2001). Google Scholar

7. 

T. M. Le et al., “New insights into image processing of cortical blood flow monitors using laser speckle imaging,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, 26 833 –842 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2007.892643 ITMID4 0278-0062 (2007). Google Scholar

8. 

J. W. Goodman, Speckle Phenomena in Optics: Theory and Application, Roberts and Company Publishers( (2007). Google Scholar

9. 

D. D. Duncan et al., “Statistics of laser speckle,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25 9 –15 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.25.000009 JOAOD6 0740-3232 (2008). Google Scholar

10. 

V. Lambrecht et al., “Reliability of the quantitative assessment of peripheral blood perfusion by laser speckle contrast analysis in a systemic sclerosis cohort,” Ann. Rheum. Dis., 75 1263 –1264 https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2015-208857 ARDIAO 0003-4967 (2016). Google Scholar

11. 

Y. Shinohara et al., “Evaluation of fundus blood flow in normal individuals and patients with internal carotid artery obstruction using laser speckle flowgraphy,” PLoS One, 12 e0169596 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169596 POLNCL 1932-6203 (2017). Google Scholar

12. 

R. Ambrus et al., “A reduced gastric corpus microvascular blood flow during Ivor–Lewis esophagectomy detected by laser speckle contrast imaging technique,” Scand. J. Gastroenterol., 52 455 –461 https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2016.1265664 (2017). Google Scholar

13. 

A. Parthasarathy et al., “Robust flow measurement with multi-exposure speckle imaging,” Opt. Express, 16 (3), 1975 –1989 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.16.001975 OPEXFF 1094-4087 (2008). Google Scholar

14. 

M. Chammas and F. Pain, “Synthetic exposure with a CMOS camera for multiple exposure speckle imaging of blood flow,” Sci. Rep., 12 4708 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08647-6 SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2022). Google Scholar

15. 

R. Farraro, O. Fathi and B. Choi, “Handheld, point-of-care laser speckle imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt., 21 (9), 094001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.094001 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2016). Google Scholar

16. 

B. Lertsakdadet et al., “Handheld motion stabilized laser speckle imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 10 5149 –5158 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.10.005149 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2019). Google Scholar

17. 

A. Chizari et al., “Prediction of motion artifacts caused by translation in handheld laser speckle contrast imaging,” J. Biomed. Opt., 28 (4), 046005 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.4.046005 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2023). Google Scholar

18. 

A. Chizari et al., “Exploration of movement artefacts in handheld laser speckle contrast perfusion imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 11 2352 –2365 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.387252 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2020). Google Scholar

19. 

Y. Wang et al., “Improving the estimation of flow speed for laser speckle imaging with single exposure time,” Opt. Lett., 42 57 –60 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.42.000057 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2017). Google Scholar

20. 

M. Siket et al., “Time varied illumination laser speckle contrast imaging,” Opt. Lett., 46 (4), 713 –716 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.413767 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2021). Google Scholar

21. 

K. P. Bjerre et al., “Coronary flow velocity reserve and myocardial deformation predict long-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients,” J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr., 34 (12), 1294 –1302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2021.07.012 JSECEJ 0894-7317 (2021). Google Scholar

22. 

Y. Yuan et al., “Pulsatile flow measurement by a speckle triangle assessment,” Front. Phys., 9 785540 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2021.785540 (2021). Google Scholar

23. 

M. A. Davis et al., “Sensitivity of laser speckle contrast imaging to flow perturbations in the cortex,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 7 (3), 759 –775 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000759 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2016). Google Scholar

24. 

P. Zakharov et al., “Non-ergodicity correction in laser speckle biomedical imaging,” in Eur. Conf. Biomed. Opt., 13 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1364/ECBO.2007.6631_13 Google Scholar

25. 

C. Liu et al., “Choosing a model for laser speckle contrast imaging,” Biomed. Opt. Express, 12 (6), 3571 –3583 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.426521 BOEICL 2156-7085 (2021). Google Scholar

26. 

D. D. Postnov et al., “Dynamic light scattering imaging,” Sci. Adv., 6 eabc4628 https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abc4628 STAMCV 1468-6996 (2020). Google Scholar

27. 

S. J. Kirkpatrick et al., “Detrimental effects of speckle-pixel size matching in laser speckle contrast imaging,” Opt. Lett., 33 (24), 2886 –2888 https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.33.002886 OPLEDP 0146-9592 (2008). Google Scholar

28. 

Y. Yuan et al., “High-dynamic-range blood flow rate measurement in a large-diameter vessel,” Appl. Opt., 60 (23), 6837 –6842 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.432846 APOPAI 0003-6935 (2021). Google Scholar

29. 

J. W. Goodman, Statistical Optics, Wiley( (1985). Google Scholar

30. 

D. D. Duncan et al., “Statistics of local speckle contrast,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, 25 9 –15 https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.25.000009 JOAOD6 0740-3232 (2008). Google Scholar

31. 

Y. Yuan et al., “Speckle evaluation in laser display: from speckle contrast to speckle influence degree,” Opt. Commun., 454 124405 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2019.124405 OPCOB8 0030-4018 (2020). Google Scholar

32. 

P. Padmanaban et al., “Assessment of flow within developing chicken vasculature and biofabricated vascularized tissues using multimodal imaging techniques,” Sci. Rep., 11 18251 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-97008-w SRCEC3 2045-2322 (2021). Google Scholar

33. 

K. van As et al., “Toward detecting atherosclerosis using dynamic laser speckle contrast imaging: a numerical study,” J. Appl. Phys., 131 184902 https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085411 JAPIAU 0021-8979 (2022). Google Scholar

34. 

A. Plyer et al., “Imaging the vasculature of a beating heart by dynamic speckle: the challenge of a quasiperiodic motion,” J. Biomed. Opt., 28 (4), 046007 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.4.046007 JBOPFO 1083-3668 (2023). Google Scholar

Biography

Hong Li Liu received his master’s degree in medicine from Capital Medical University in 2020. He is a third-year doctoral student in cardiac surgery at Capital Medical University. His research interests include LSCI and photoacoustic imaging.

Yuan Yuan is a research associate at Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. She received her PhD from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2019. Her research interests mainly focus on LSCI for myocardial preclinical and clinical applications.

Li Han is a second-year student at the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. He received his bachelor’s degree from Capital Normal University in 2021. His research interests include biomechanics and optical imaging.

Yong Bi is a professor at the Technical Institute of Physics and Chemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences. He received his PhD from the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2004. His research interests focus on the development and application of novel biomedical imaging technologies.

Wen Yuan Yu is an attending doctor at Beijing Anzhen Hospital of Capital Medical University. He received his PhD from Capital Medical University in 2020. His research interests focus on biomedical imaging and navigation.

Yang Yu is a chief surgeon at Beijing Anzhen Hospital and a professor at Capital Medical University. He received his PhD from Harbin Medical Sciences University in 2003. His research interests focus on the development and application of novel biomedical imaging technologies and artificial intelligence.

CC BY: © The Authors. Published by SPIE under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Distribution or reproduction of this work in whole or in part requires full attribution of the original publication, including its DOI.
Hong Li Liu, Yuan Yuan, Li Han, Yong Bi, Wen Yuan Yu, and Yang Yu "Wide dynamic range measurement of blood flow in vivo using laser speckle contrast imaging," Journal of Biomedical Optics 29(1), 016009 (27 January 2024). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.29.1.016009
Received: 19 September 2023; Accepted: 8 January 2024; Published: 27 January 2024
Advertisement
Advertisement
KEYWORDS
Blood circulation

Laser speckle contrast imaging

Arteries

Speckle

In vivo imaging

Animals

Veins

Back to Top