1.IntroductionOptical imaging is a non-invasive imaging technology that utilizes near-infrared (NIR) light with wavelengths ranging from .1–4 NIR light is highly sensitive to changes in tissue optical parameter,5,6 which allows for the reconstruction of optical properties like diffuse and absorption coefficients within the tissue. Optical imaging provides high spatial resolution and image quality and makes it a valuable tool in various bio-imaging fields.7,8 It has been effectively utilized in applications, such as breast cancer diagnosis, brain function imaging, human joint detection, and thyroid diagnosis.9–11 Optical imaging configurations are divided into the parallel plate, ring and reflective configuration, according to the source and detector placement.12–14 Parallel plate transmission configuration is similar to X-ray mammography. It allows for effective imaging of the breast and detection of abnormalities.15,16 Ring configuration is suitable for mammogram and functional brain imaging. This configuration offers the advantage of capturing images from multiple angles and provides comprehensive information about the detection tissue.17 The reflective configuration is commonly used in handheld probes for monitoring cerebral cortex or breast tissue. The light is delivered to the tissue surface by the source, and the reflected light is detected by the adjacent detector.18,19 This configuration enables close-proximity imaging and real-time monitoring of tissue function.20 Minghang Li et al. proposed a 3D reconstruction method for highly reflective diffuse object.21 Sieno et al. opened the way for optical imaging using SiPM reflective mode source detector arrays.22 Mimura obtained the first 3D tissue oxygen saturation map of the human thyroid gland using reflective configuration.23 Optical imaging in scattering medium is classified into the continuous wave (CW), frequency domain, and time-resolved imaging according to the different source.24–26 The CW imaging is widely studied and utilized due to its short data acquisition time and cost-effectiveness of detection devices.27 However, CW optical imaging can only monitor changes in optical properties through intensity variations and result in the low signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and the limited structural imaging capabilities.28 To achieve the high resolution and accuracy in image reconstruction, researchers have developed various methods and algorithms.29 By optimizing the position and orientation of the source detector configuration, the amount of data can be reduced and the quality of the imaging can be improved.30,31 The higher reconstruction quality with a high SNR can be achieved by advancements in signal processing techniques. The accuracy and resolution of the reconstructed images can be significantly improved by increasing the SNR.32,33 In our group, chaotic laser is used to enhance the imaging capabilities of optical imaging. Preliminary investigations have verified the potential of the high-quality images of scattering medium.34 Chaotic lasers have the noise-like characteristics in the time series and delta-like auto-correlation functions. The correlation characteristics of chaotic lasers have been widely used in radar applications. Rumbaugh proposed a chaotic lidar transmitter based on an ultra-long cavity fiber laser for underwater ranging and imaging applications.35 Ning Jiang proposed a pulsed chaotic multiple input multiple output radar system to achieve centimeter-level resolution for multi-target ranging.36 Fan-Yi and Jia-Ming investigated the new chaotic radar system and proposed chaotic radar with high distance resolution.37 In this paper, we use the chaotic laser as the light source for reflective configuration optical imaging to study the reconstruction performance of the absorption coefficients of scattering medium. The paper is organized as follows. In Sec. 2, describes the experimental setup, including the production of scattering medium and the reflective optical imaging system with chaotic laser. In Sec. 3, the measurements of the peak values of correlation of chaotic in the proposed system are given and image reconstruction is performed. In Sec. 4, we analyze and discuss the reconstruction results. In Sec. 5, we made the conclusions. 2.Experimental Setup2.1.Tissue-Like PhantomsTissue-like phantoms are used as scattering medium. Agar (Regular Agarose G-10, BIOWEST) powder was used as a coagulant. Water and agar powder were heated and placed in a water bath at a constant temperature of 55°C. Intralipid (100 mL; Intralipid solution 20%) was mixed and stirred with the agar solution and poured into the prepared to produce a tissue matrix of the length of 80.0 mm in, the width of 50.0 mm and the height of 15.0 mm. The top and front views of the tissue-like phantoms are shown in Figs. 1(a) and 1(b). The diffuse and absorption coefficients of the background tissues are and at 1070.22 nm, respectively. A specific concentration of India ink (CM0544, BR, DULY) mixed with 20% Intralipid to simulate the inhomogeneous region is injected into a hole with diameter of 5.0 mm in the tissue-like phantoms. The absorption coefficient of inhomogeneous regions is . The reflective S-D configuration is shown in Fig. 1(c), where the laser source (S1-S5) and detector (D1-D15) are placed on the same side of the tissue phantom, laser source in steps of 1 mm, detector in steps of 2 mm. The laser source irradiated the phantom, and the detector collected the chaotic laser. The time-series of detection signal with different chaotic laser sources were measured at fifteen detection positions. Measurements of the homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms are shown in Fig. 1(d). The cross-correlation function is a statistical representation used to analyze the degree of similarity between the time series of two signals. The cross-correlation function between the detection signal and the reference signal can be expressed as where is the detection signal and is the reference signal. represents the mean value, is the time, and is the time delay of the two signals. According to the properties of the delta-like cross-correlation of chaotic laser, is an ideal delta function. The peak value of the cross-correlation function is related to the intensity of the detection signal and the reference signal of the chaotic signals. When the reference signal of the chaotic signals remains unchanged, the peak value of the cross-correlation function is related to the changes of the detection signal caused by the scattering and absorption of the tissue phantom. For reflective optical imaging system with chaotic laser, image reconstruction is achieved by the measured peak values of the cross-correlation function as boundary measurements at the reflection boundaries.2.2.Experimental Setup of Chaotic LaserThe ytterbium-doped fiber (YDF, SM-YSF-LO-HP, NUFERN) chaotic laser system consists of a chaotic laser source (I) and an amplifier (II) as shown in Fig. 2. The 976 nm optical signal generated by a laser diode (LD-I, LC96Z6OO-74) passes through a fiber ring cavity, which is composed of a wavelength division multiplexer (WDM-I, WDM-1×2-980/1064-0-A55), YDF, single-mode fiber (SMF, 160-XP, NUFERN), polarization-independent isolator (ISO-I, I-1064-00-S-C-10-L-N), polarization controller (PC, FPC-100, Thorlabs), and 90:10 optical coupler (OC, WBC-1×2-1060-10/90). The chaotic laser is generated based on the nonlinear effect by adjusting the pump current and the polarization in the cavity. The chaotic laser is then coupled into the YDF through an ISO-II (I-1064-00-S-C-10-L-N) and WDM-II (WDM-1×2-980/1064-0-A55). LD-II (LC96Z6OO-74) at 976 nm is used for amplification of the chaotic laser source. 2.3.Reflective Optical Imaging System With Chaotic LaserThe reflective optical imaging system with chaotic laser is shown in Fig. 3. The chaotic laser was split into the detection and reference signal with a 90:10 OC (WBC-1×2-1060-10/90). The reference optical signal has a power of 13 mW and is detected by photoelectric detector PD-I (DET01CFC, THORLABS). The collimated chaotic laser source with the power of 115 mW illuminates the tissue phantoms. The detection signal is detected by the photoelectric detector (PD-II, PDA05CF2, THORLABS) mounted on a motorized precision displacement stage. The reference signal I’(t) is measured by PD-I and the detection signal I(t) is measured by PD-II. The electrical signals through PD-I and PD-II are recorded with the oscilloscope (OSC, MSO64, TEKTRONIX) at the same time. The cross-correlation between the electric signals of the output of PD-I and PD-II is carried out by the data processing system. 3.Experimental Result3.1.Characteristics of Chaotic LaserThe time series of the chaotic laser is shown in Fig. 4(a), which the intensity varies randomly with time. The optical spectrum in Fig. 4(b) shows that the central wavelength of the chaotic laser is 1070.22 nm. The delta-like characteristics of the ytterbium-doped chaotic laser are obtained by the auto-correlation algorithm and are shown in Fig. 4(c). These results highlight the properties exhibited by the chaotic laser and provide the further insights into the nature of the chaotic laser. The detection and reference signal measured by the PD-II and PD-I are shown in Fig. 5. Figure 5(a) shows the time series of the detection signal and the time series is random. Figure 5(b) shows the time series of the reference signal and time series is also random. 3.2.Correlation Characteristics of Chaotic Laser in Inhomogeneous RegionsThe experiments by scattering tissue inhomogeneous with mixtures of India ink and Intralipid in a certain concentration. The single inhomogeneous phantom and multiple-inhomogeneous phantom were used to analyze the correlation characteristics of chaotic laser after scattering. The absorption and scattering coefficients of the inhomogeneous phantom are and . Respectively, the depth of the inhomogeneous hole of single inhomogeneous phantom is 8.2 mm, the coordinates of center of the inhomogeneous hole were . In the multi-inhomogeneous phantoms, the depth of the inhomogeneous hole is 14.0 mm, the coordinates of the two inhomogeneous holes were and . The geometric centers of these regions were 7 mm apart, with a minimum distance of 2 mm. The detection signal of chaotic laser I(t) for the single and multiple-inhomogeneous phantom after scattering was measured experimentally and cross-correlated with the reference laser . The peak values of cross-correlation of chaotic laser of inhomogeneous phantom in the case of five laser sources are measured in Figs. 6(a) and 6(b), and it indicated that the peak values of correlation of chaotic laser decreases with increasing S-D distance. Figures 6(c) and 6(d) show a comparison of the peak values of chaotic correlation in homogeneous and inhomogeneous regions. Due to the high absorption characteristics of the inhomogeneous region for NIR light, the peak values of correlation of chaotic are clearly different at detector positions corresponding to the high absorption regions. The peak values of chaotic correlation demonstrate the corresponding reflectance measurements and illustrate the valid information of the inhomogeneous regions. Figures 7(a) and 7(b) show the correlation curve of S1-D10 positions in the case of a single inhomogeneous region. The coordinate of the peak in Fig. 7(a) is and it indicates that the time delay between the detection signal and reference signal caused by the distance difference between the two signals is and 0.032 is the peak value of cross-correlation. The coordinate of the peak in Fig. 7(b) is and it indicates that the absorption and scattering of the phantom are higher in the inhomogeneous region than in the homogeneous region. Figure 7(c) demonstrates the correlation curve of S1-D4 positions in the case of a single inhomogeneous region and the coordinate of the peak is . The peak value of cross-correlation of the homogeneous region is the same with the Fig. 7(c), and it is because the distribution of the absorption and scattering coefficients in homogeneous region differs only in the hole of inhomogeneous region in the tissue-like phantoms. 3.3.Image Reconstruction Based on the Peak Values of the CorrelationImage reconstruction is defined as the inverse problem of the photon propagation model, which involves the internal spatial distribution of the objective function using boundary measurements of tissue-like phantoms. Diffusion equation is used to describe the transmission of chaotic laser within tissue-like phantoms. We used the finite element method framework for the forward and reverse problems of chaotic laser.38 The peak values of correlation of chaotic laser are used as input to the inverse problem of image reconstruction and the recovery of the absorption coefficients in the phantoms. The reconstruction results for single and multiple-inhomogeneous phantom are shown in Fig. 8. 4.DiscussionTo compare with the CW optical imaging, we carried out the experimental analysis of the optical imaging system based on CW laser. The CW laser was obtained by adjusting the polarization control in the ring fiber laser. Figure 9(a) demonstrates that the voltage of output light intensity remains stable with time. Figure 9(b) demonstrates the voltage of the output light intensity with detection position in the measurement with CW laser, and the voltage of output light intensity decreases exponentially with increasing distance between the light source and the detector. Figures 9(c) and 9(d) demonstrates the corresponding image reconstruction results. The presented plots illustrate the characterization in the case of a single inhomogeneous phantom and demonstrate that it is possible to obtain partial information about the inhomogeneous regions. Figure 10(a) illustrates the distribution of absorption coefficients extracted at depth of 10 mm in the reconstructed image of a single inhomogeneous phantom. The results of the reconstruction indicate that the maximum absorption coefficient using the peak values of correlation of chaotic laser is , the maximum absorption coefficient of image reconstruction with CW is . Figure 10(b) shows the absorption coefficients extracted at 12 mm depth of the reconstructed image of multiple inhomogeneous regions in the variation curves. The maximum absorption coefficients of the two inhomogeneous regions are and based on the peak values of correlation of chaotic laser for image reconstruction. The absorption coefficients of the same regions with the intensity reconstruction are and . The true value of the absorption coefficient is . This difference suggests that peak values of correlation of chaotic laser in the reconstruction process can achieve the more accurate estimation of the absorption coefficient. The analysis is evaluated from reconstruction accuracy and image quality. The reconstruction accuracy is analyzed by the absorption coefficient error and the geometric center error. The distances between these coordinates and the true coordinates were calculated based on the center-of-mass coordinates of the different targets in the optical imaging reconstruction results. The geometric center error is defined as where is the true diameter of the ground. The and are the coordinates at the absorption coefficient reconstruction maximum, and are the true center position coordinates of the ground. For a single inhomogeneous region, is 33.8% and is 34.7%, and and represent the correlation and intensity respectively. For multiple inhomogeneous regions, is 52.1% and is 92.3%. The coefficient error is defined as where and are the ground truth and reconstructed absorption coefficients. For single inhomogeneous region, is 12.5% and is 25.6%. For multiple inhomogeneous regions, is 20.8% and is 28.4%. The correlation data of multiple inhomogeneous regions are averaged, and the corresponding analysis results are given in Table 1.Table 1Results of reconstruction.
Due to the combination of chaotic signal and cross-correlation algorithm, the anti-interference capability of the detection signal is effectively improved, which makes the system to have the better localization accuracy and absorption coefficient reconstruction for inhomogeneous regions. Compared with CW laser, the chaotic correlation technology can result in the significant decrease in both geometric center error and absorption coefficient error. For a single inhomogeneous region, the geometric center error and absorption coefficient error are decreased by 1.02 times and 2.04 times, respectively. For multiple inhomogeneous regions, the geometric center error and absorption coefficient error are decreased by 1.77 times and 1.36 times, respectively. Kullback–Leibler (KL) scatter is employed to measure the similarity between the reconstructed image and the reference image, where smaller values indicate better similarity [31]. Furthermore, the mean square error (MSE) and peak SNR (PSNR) are utilized to evaluate the distortion of the reconstructed image. A smaller MSE and a larger PSNR indicate higher image quality. The effective resolution (ERES) is defined as twice the distance between the center of the actual inhomogeneous region and any node with a value greater than or equal to 50% of the maximum value in the reconstructed image. The performance evaluation results of reconstructed image are given in Table 2. Table 2Performance evaluation of reconstructed image.
The ERES of the reconstructed images using peak values of correlation of chaotic laser in both the single and multiple inhomogeneous regions is lower compared to the results with the CW laser and it is indicated the higher reconstruction resolution with the chaotic laser. The ERES in the reconstructed images is also lower than the values reported in the Ref. 39. In terms of MSE, the reconstructed images using the peak values of correlation of chaotic laser show an order of magnitude lower error compared to the CW laser under a single inhomogeneous region, which better represents the real situation. The difference becomes smaller under multiple inhomogeneous regions due to the increased complexity of the phantom. The MSE of the reconstructed images are lower than those reported in the Ref. 40. For the evaluation of PSNR, the peak values of correlation of chaotic laser have significantly higher values compared to the results with CW laser. The KL image similarity assessments demonstrate a high similarity of the reconstructed images using the peak values of chaotic correlation to the actual situation. 5.ConclusionWe propose and demonstrate a reflective scattered chaotic laser system for optical imaging. Experimental results validate that the variation of the peak values of correlation coefficient of the chaotic laser adheres to the theoretical model. We successful reconstructions of the absorption coefficient distribution within tissue-like phantoms in both single and multiple inhomogeneous regions. Furthermore, the evaluation of image quality indicates that the unique characteristics of the chaotic laser can be effectively utilized to provide enhanced spatial resolution enhancement and more precise reconstructed images. This novel approach offers a promising detection laser source for non-invasive medical imaging and holds potential applications in various areas such as skin, brain, and joint-related diagnoses. Code and Data AvailabilityData underlying the results presented in this paper are not publicly available at this time but may be obtained from the authors upon reasonable request. AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61975141, 61575137, and 61675144) and the Shanxi 1331 Project Key Innovative Research Team. ReferencesM. Alayed and M. J. Deen,
“Time-resolved diffuse optical spectroscopy and imaging using solid-state detectors: characteristics, present status, and research challenges,”
Sensors, 17
(9), 2115 https://doi.org/10.3390/s17092115 SNSRES 0746-9462
(2017).
Google Scholar
L. A. Dempsey et al.,
“Geometrically complex 3D-printed phantoms for diffuse optical imaging,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 8
(3), 1754
–1762 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.8.001754 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2017).
Google Scholar
A. Gibson and H. Dehghani,
“Diffuse optical imaging,”
Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A, 367
(1900), 3055
–3072 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2009.0080
(2009).
Google Scholar
N. M. Gregg et al.,
“Brain specificity of diffuse optical imaging: improvements from superficial signal regression and tomography,”
Front. Neuroenerg., 2 14 https://doi.org/10.3389/fnene.2010.00014
(2010).
Google Scholar
Y. Hoshi and Y. Yamada,
“Overview of diffuse optical tomography and its clinical applications,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 21
(9), 091312 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.9.091312 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2016).
Google Scholar
W. Cong, X. Intes and G. Wang,
“Optical tomographic imaging for breast cancer detection,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 22
(9), 096011 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.22.9.096011 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2017).
Google Scholar
K. G. Bridger, J. R. Roccabruna and T. M. Baran,
“Optical property recovery with spatially-resolved diffuse reflectance at short source-detector separations using a compact fiber-optic probe,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 12
(12), 7388
–7404 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.443332 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2021).
Google Scholar
S. Mahdy et al.,
“A modified source-detector configuration for the discrimination between normal and diseased human breast based on the continuous-wave diffuse optical imaging approach: a simulation study,”
Lasers Med. Sci., 37
(3), 1855
–1864 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-021-03440-9
(2022).
Google Scholar
T. Li et al.,
“Multi-wavelength spatial frequency domain diffuse optical tomography using single-pixel imaging based on lock-in photon counting,”
Opt. Express, 27
(16), 23138
–23156 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.27.023138 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2019).
Google Scholar
R. C. Mesquita et al.,
“Influence of probe pressure on the diffuse correlation spectroscopy blood flow signal: extra-cerebral contributions,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 4
(7), 978
–994 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.4.000978 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2013).
Google Scholar
Z. Yuan et al.,
“Three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography of osteoarthritis: initial results in the finger joints,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 12
(3), 034001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.2737420 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2007).
Google Scholar
J.-M. Yu et al.,
“Phantom verification for a ring-scanning and prone diffuse optical imaging system,”
Opt. Commun., 405 177
–184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2017.08.014 OPCOB8 0030-4018
(2017).
Google Scholar
T. Shimokawa et al.,
“Diffuse optical tomography using multi-directional sources and detectors,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 7
(7), 2623
–2640 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.002623 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2016).
Google Scholar
J. Jiang et al.,
“Dynamic time domain near-infrared optical tomography based on a SPAD camera,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 11
(10), 5470
–5477 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.399387 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2020).
Google Scholar
R. M. Al Abdi et al.,
“Mechanical and hemodynamic responses of breast tissue under mammographic-like compression during functional dynamic optical imaging,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 11
(10), 5425
–5441 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.398110 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2020).
Google Scholar
Y. Wang et al.,
“Compact fiber-free parallel-plane multi-wavelength diffuse optical tomography system for breast imaging,”
Opt. Express, 30
(5), 6469
–6486 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.448874 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2022).
Google Scholar
E. E. Vidal-Rosas et al.,
“Evaluating a new generation of wearable high-density diffuse optical tomography technology via retinotopic mapping of the adult visual cortex,”
Neurophotonics, 8
(2), 025002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.NPh.8.2.025002
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. Jiang et al.,
“2.5 Hz sample rate time-domain near-infrared optical tomography based on SPAD-camera image tissue hemodynamics,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 13
(1), 133
–146 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.441061 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. Shokoufi and F. Golnaraghi,
“Handheld diffuse optical breast scanner probe for cross-sectional imaging of breast tissue,”
J. Innovative Opt. Health Sci., 12
(02), 1950008 https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793545819500081
(2019).
Google Scholar
L. Wang et al.,
“Non-invasive monitoring of blood oxygenation in human placentas via concurrent diffuse optical spectroscopy and ultrasound imaging,”
Nat. Biomed. Eng., 6
(9), 1017
–1030 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-022-00913-2
(2022).
Google Scholar
M. Li, Y. Cao and H. Wu,
“Three-dimensional reconstruction for highly reflective diffuse object based on online measurement,”
Opt. Commun., 533 129276 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2023.129276 OPCOB8 0030-4018
(2023).
Google Scholar
L. Di Sieno et al.,
“Time-domain diffuse optical tomography using silicon photomultipliers: feasibility study,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 21
(11), 116002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.21.11.116002 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2016).
Google Scholar
T. Mimura et al.,
“Imaging the human thyroid using three-dimensional diffuse optical tomography: a preliminary study,”
Appl. Sci., 11
(4), 1670 https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041670
(2021).
Google Scholar
J. M. Cochran et al.,
“Hybrid time-domain and continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography instrument with concurrent, clinical magnetic resonance imaging for breast cancer imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 24
(5), 051409 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.5.051409 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2019).
Google Scholar
W. Chen et al.,
“Lock-in-photon-counting-based highly-sensitive and large-dynamic imaging system for continuous-wave diffuse optical tomography,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 7
(2), 499
–511 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.7.000499 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2016).
Google Scholar
M. Alayed et al.,
“Time-resolved diffuse optical tomography system using an accelerated inverse problem solver,”
Opt. Express, 26
(2), 963
–979 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.26.000963 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2018).
Google Scholar
N. A. Carbone et al.,
“Camera-based CW diffuse optical tomography for obtaining 3D absorption maps by means of digital tomosynthesis,”
Biomed. Phys. Eng. Express, 6
(6), 065034 https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/abc633
(2020).
Google Scholar
E. Y. Chae et al.,
“Development of digital breast tomosynthesis and diffuse optical tomography fusion imaging for breast cancer detection,”
Sci. Rep., 10
(1), 13127 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70103-0 SRCEC3 2045-2322
(2020).
Google Scholar
R. A. Stillwell et al.,
“A scalable, multi-wavelength, broad bandwidth frequency-domain near-infrared spectroscopy platform for real-time quantitative tissue optical imaging,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 12
(11), 7261
–7279 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.435913 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2021).
Google Scholar
T. Das and P. K. Dutta,
“Dual-wavelength diffuse optical tomographic system for direct concentration measurement,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 69
(9), 7043
–7050 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2020.2978965 IEIMAO 0018-9456
(2020).
Google Scholar
H. Uysal et al.,
“Effect of optode geometry and regularization methods on low-cost diffuse optical tomography systems,”
Opt. Quantum Electron., 55
(1), 60 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-022-04366-4 OQELDI 0306-8919
(2022).
Google Scholar
H. Vavadi et al.,
“Compact ultrasound-guided diffuse optical tomography system for breast cancer imaging,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 24
(2), 021203 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.24.2.021203 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2018).
Google Scholar
J. Sutin et al.,
“Time-domain diffuse correlation spectroscopy,”
Optica, 3
(9), 1006
–1013 https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.3.001006
(2016).
Google Scholar
J. Li et al.,
“Image reconstruction with the chaotic fiber laser in scattering media,”
Appl. Opt., 60
(13), 4004
–4012 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.420441 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2021).
Google Scholar
L. K. Rumbaugh et al.,
“A 532 nm chaotic lidar transmitter for high resolution underwater ranging and imaging,”
in OCEANS-San Diego,
1
–6
(2013). Google Scholar
W. Feng et al.,
“Pulsed-chaos MIMO radar based on a single flat-spectrum and Delta-like autocorrelation optical chaos source,”
Opt. Express, 30
(4), 4782
–4792 https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.450949 OPEXFF 1094-4087
(2022).
Google Scholar
L. Fan-Yi and L. Jia-Ming,
“Chaotic radar using nonlinear laser dynamics,”
IEEE J. Quantum Electron., 40
(6), 815
–820 https://doi.org/10.1109/JQE.2004.828237 IEJQA7 0018-9197
(2004).
Google Scholar
M. Schweiger and S. Arridge,
“The Toast++ software suite for forward and inverse modeling in optical tomography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 19
(4), 040801 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.19.4.040801 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2014).
Google Scholar
G. A. Perkins, A. T. Eggebrecht and H. Dehghani,
“Quantitative evaluation of frequency domain measurements in high density diffuse optical tomography,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 26
(5), 056001 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.26.5.056001 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2021).
Google Scholar
T. Das, B. P. V. Dileep and P. K. Dutta,
“Generalized curved beam back-projection method for near-infrared imaging using banana function,”
Appl. Opt., 57
(8), 1838
–1848 https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.57.001838 APOPAI 0003-6935
(2018).
Google Scholar
Biography |
Inhomogeneities
Signal detection
Image restoration
Laser scattering
Optical imaging
Reflection
Absorption