1.IntroductionAnnual costs for wound care in the United States ranged from $28.1 billion to $31.7 billion.1 In the context of problematic cases, hospital-based wound clinics had reported wound healing rates as low as 30.5%.2 Wound healing is a dynamic and complex process, encompassing four phases: the hemostatic phase, the inflammatory phase, the proliferative phase, and the remodeling phase.3 Among these phases, the proliferative phase is recognized as the most crucial stage for wound healing, attracting extensive regenerative approaches.4 Tissue oxygenation is considered the key factor during the proliferative phase, and local tissue hypoxia is widely accepted as an indicator of impaired wound healing.5 Therefore, effective monitoring of wound condition necessitates methods for assessing wound tissue oxygenation, highlighting its importance as a key target especially in open wounds. Various methods have been proposed for assessing wound tissue oxygenation, encompassing both direct and indirect, as well as invasive and noninvasive approaches.6 Although invasive assessments have disadvantages such as increasing the risk of infection, additional pain and discomfort for patients, and trauma to the wound site, which could delay wound healing, noninvasive wound assessments are preferred. Noninvasive approaches include laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI), hyperspectral imaging (HSI), and multispectral imaging (MSI). The principle of LSCI is to monitor the movement of red blood cells within cutaneous tissues. By calculating the changes in the frequency and speckling of the reflected laser light captured, blood perfusion and flux can be estimated, respectively.7–9 However, the expense of the procedures is a lot, and their susceptibility to interference by ambient light limits the clinical application of LSCI.10 In comparison, under environments affected by ambient light, HSI and MSI can generate reliable results.11–14 HSI emits broadband light within visible and near-infrared (NIR) wavelengths and thus can acquire oxygenation parameters of cutaneous tissue, such as oxyhemoglobin (), deoxyhemoglobin (Hb), and tissue oxygen saturation (). However, HSI has the disadvantage of complex calculation processes and high computational power. MSI, a simplified version of HSI, captures a few specific bands covering the spectrum from the visible to NIR. MSI yields the same parameters as HSI using simple hardware structures.6,15 Overall, MSI has a lower cost and requires less computational power than LSCI and HSI.16 Systems utilizing NIR wavelength exhibit substantial potential due to their capacity for deep tissue penetration (millimeters to centimeters).17 Time-domain near-infrared spectroscopy (TD-NIRS) is another technique that uses NIR light for determining , with a particular focus on probing internal tissues such as the brain using measurements conducted on the head.18 TD-NIRS requires an advanced system capable of measuring both the wavelength and the arrival time of single photons.19 This information allows the determination of at different depths, in both superficial and deeper tissues.20 NIR light passes harmlessly through the skin and possesses minimal tissue absorption and preferential scattering by hemoglobin.21 Hemoglobin undergoes spectroscopic and magnetic property changes corresponding to its degree of oxygenation, with and Hb exhibiting different absorption spectra in the NIR range.19 The discernible differences in reflected light can thus be employed to detect physiological changes indicative of tissue oxygenation. Due to the significant interest in tissue oxygenation measurement, NIR imaging has been applied in prior research on conditions such as diabetic ulcers, decubitus ulcers, burn wounds, and chronic wounds.22–28 However, in related studies, none have validated NIR imaging concurrently with other imaging systems and biochemical methods. Our study introduced an MSI system based on NIR for detecting , which we refer to as the tissue oxygen saturation detecting (TOSD) system. As TOSD is a relatively new technique, it is crucial to cross-validate it and compare its performance with established techniques that also contribute to evaluating wound conditions, such as LSCI.7,9 We hypothesize that the TOSD system will be more sensitive and accurate in correlating to compared with LSCI due to its use of NIR wavelengths, which allow for deeper tissue penetration and minimal interference from ambient light. In addition, the TOSD system’s measurement of based on the absorption spectra of and Hb may provide a more reliable assessment compared with the implicit relationship of with blood flow measured by LSCI. To validate the performance of the TOSD system, we employed various methods in an animal model platform. Three imaging systems, namely, digital photography, TOSD, and LSCI, were used to detect tissue oxygenation in open wounds. Furthermore, we analyzed the biochemistry profile of wound discharge to provide additional support for the translational significance of the TOSD system. 2.Materials and Methods2.1.Animal Wound ModelMice aged 6 to 8 weeks were housed at the National Cheng Kung University Laboratory Animal Center, under a regulated environment. All mice were maintained in rooms with a temperature range of 18 to 26°C, relative humidity of 30% to 70%, and a regular light/dark cycle of 12/12 h to fit their circadian rhythm. The air quality in the animal rooms was maintained using a high-efficiency particulate air filter. The experiment was conducted under the supervision of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC approval numbers 111273 and 112060). A 6-mm splinted full-thickness excisional wound model was generated following the established methods of Galiano et al.29 One full-thickness dermal wound, measuring 6 mm in diameter, was surgically created on the left side of the dorsum [Fig. 1(a)]. To prevent contraction of the wound by the panniculus carnosus muscle, a silicone ring was employed, and the wound was secured with eight interrupted sutures using 6-0 nylon. Tegaderm was applied to cover the wounds after construction, and the dressings were changed every other day. Photographs of the wounds were captured using three imaging systems at the time of surgery and during each dressing change over a 12-day period. Wounding was initiated on day 0, with a subsequent observation of wound imaging and discharge sampling on each experimental day [Fig. 1(b)]. 2.2.Imaging SystemBased on the mouse excisional wound model described previously, the created wound was recorded by three imaging systems: digital photography (Stylus TG3 Tough, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan), TOSD, and LSCI [Fig. 1(a)]. We have already established the TOSD system to measure .16 Detailed illustrations of the theory of cutaneous tissue optics and the TOSD setup are described in our collaborating work. TOSD is an MSI-based tissue oxygenation measurement system that provides an indirect method of tissue oxygenation measuring by irradiating the tissue with two wavelengths of red light (660 nm) and NIR (880 nm). Both lights penetrate the superficial tissue of the skin layer, and the reflected and scattered lights captured by a monochrome camera were utilized to calculate the levels.30 The TOSD system consists of a monochrome camera (MB152USB, OMRON SENTECH, Ebina, Japan), a light-emitting diode (LED) light module, and a control unit for synchronizing the camera and LEDs. Under the irradiation of the LED light module, the reflected () and scattered () lights from the tissue are captured by the monochrome camera. Hemoglobin with different degrees of oxygenation contributes to considerable differences in the reflected images. Oxygenation parameters, including , Hb, and , can be computed through the captured images. Following the steps shown below, estimating levels was calculated31 [Fig. S1 in the Supplementary Material]. The modified Beer–Lambert law describing the relationship between light and chromophores is used in Eq. (1),32 where is the wavelength of the light source, is the optical density, which equals the sum of the absorbances in cutaneous tissues, is the intensity of incident light, is the intensity of reflected light, and is the intensity of the scattered light. is the absorption coefficient of chromophores, and is the concentration of chromophores. is the maximum depth of penetration of the light in cutaneous tissues By calculating the intensity of light captured by the TOSD system, the values of and are obtained. Although the other values are constants or calculated, the unknown concentration of chromophores ( and ) therefore can be deducted. Values of , representing the levels of cutaneous tissues, can be derived using Eq. (3) In our study, LSCI (moorFLPI-2, Moor Instruments, Devon, United Kingdom) was applied to validate the TOSD system. The LSCI technique quantifies the blurring of the speckle pattern caused by the motion of scattering particles (i.e., red blood cells) by calculating the speckle contrast. Speckle patterns are created based on the interactions between photons and moving red blood cells, which cause Doppler shifts in the frequency of the scattered light.7,8,10 LSCI captures the dynamic speckle patterns created, and the contrast of the speckle pattern is inversely related to the blood flow in the tissue.7,8,10 The LSCI system used in this study illuminates the tissue using infrared laser diodes with a center wavelength of 785 nm. The camera is positioned at a fixed distance of 25 cm from the measured object using two aiming lasers. By analyzing the captured speckle patterns based on the interaction between photons and moving red blood cells, a 16-color–coded tissue perfusion image is then created.9 During each experimental day, TOSD and LSCI were used simultaneously to obtain information on the open wound through our animal model platform. The images captured by TOSD and LSCI were analyzed to assess the flare intensity within the regions of interest (ROIs). The mean values within those ROIs (i.e., wound and normal skin) were computed. The ROIs were provided by two experienced plastic surgeons at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital in Tainan, Taiwan. 2.3.Wound Area AnalysisThe wound area was documented on alternate days throughout a 12-day experimental period. Each experimental day involved capturing photographs using three distinct imaging systems. Wound measurements were conducted using the freehand tool in LabelMe (ver. 4.6.0), a project developed by the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, offering a dataset of digital images with annotations. The determination of wound edges was independently performed by two observers within our team, adhering to a blinded protocol. It was ensured that the team of observers was composed of two independent senior surgeons to enhance accuracy. The wound closure rate was computed using the following equation: 2.4.Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)To assess the presence of angiogenic proteins in wound discharge, an analysis was conducted using a RayBio® C-Series Mouse Angiogenic Protein Antibody Array (RayBiotech Inc., Norcross, Georgia, United States). Wound discharge samples were collected at each dressing change over a 12-day period. The RayBiotech Mouse Angiogenesis Kit (Catalog No. AAM-ANG-1-2) was employed for ELISA. The experimental protocol was strictly adhered to as per the provided instructions. Following proper lysis and homogenization of wound discharge, the protein concentration of lysates was determined. Subsequently, 50 to of total protein was loaded on each membrane. Quantification of protein expression levels was performed by assessing the color intensity of individual spots on the membranes relative to the positive control spots prebound to the membranes. The final results are presented as mean ± SD, derived from independent experiments. 2.5.Statistical MethodsStatistical analyses were performed using Prism (ver. 9.0, GraphPad, San Diego, California, United States). All continuous data are presented as mean ± standard deviation. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey’s multiple comparison test and Sidak’s multiple comparison test were employed for datasets, including quantification of the wound area over time, quantification of , and blood flux in normal skin as well as wound during the experiment period and levels of protein expressions on different days. Comparisons of ROIs between wounds and normal skin on each day were performed using two-way ANOVA. Statistical significance was defined at a threshold of . 3.Results3.1.Wound Closure Rate Accelerates During Proliferative Phase in Mouse Excisional Wound ModelA full-thickness wound was created on the back of each mouse and splinted by a silicon ring to generate an excisional wound model on day 0. Digital photographs taken during each dressing change revealed the trend of wound healing throughout the experimental period [Fig. 2(a)]. We further quantified the changes in wound area and wound closure rate over time [Fig. 2(b), Fig. S2 in the Supplementary Material]. The size of the open wound reduced progressively, showing a significant difference from days 2 to 8. Wound closure rates were calculated and compared within three phases: days 0 to 4, days 4 to 8, and days 8 to 12. Notably, during the middle phase (days 4 to 8), wounds exhibited a greater closure percentage compared with the early and late phases of wound healing [Fig. 2(c)]. 3.2.TOSD and LSCI Both Reveal Identical Signal Changes During Wound Healing ProcessThroughout the wound healing phase, we conducted serial monitoring of the open wound for 12 days after wound creation, comparing the results obtained by both TOSD and LSCI. Initially, we established that the measured mean and median values were not statistically different for both the open wound and the unwounded skin (Fig. S3 in the Supplementary Material). Consequently, the measured mean values were used in the subsequent analysis. Representative images indicated that tissue oxygenation levels measured by TOSD exhibited similar trends of change when compared with tissue blood flow measured by LSCI [Fig. 3(a)]. In addition, stable measured signals were observed for the unwounded skin using both TOSD and LSCI [Fig. 3(b)]. In the open wound, TOSD detected a significant increase in from days 2 to 10, compared with day 0. LSCI demonstrated an identical trend of signal change during the middle phase of wound healing [Fig. 3(b)]. 3.3.TOSD and LSCI Detect Significant Signal Increase of Open Wound as Compared with Unwounded SkinTo further validate the significance of the detected signals by TOSD, we compared the values of between the unwounded skin and the wound on each experimental day. The detected of the open wound revealed a significant increase to that of the unwound skin from days 2 to 12 [Fig. 4(a)]. Moreover, such differences between the wound and the skin had mostly significant distinctions in days 4 to 8, the middle phase of wound healing [Fig. 4(b)]. The serial signals from LSCI also demonstrated a similar trend [Figs. 4(c) and 4(d)]. Given that TOSD and LSCI exhibited similar performance, we calculated a similarity measurement. A high correlation was found, and the correlation coefficient between these two systems is 0.66 [Fig. 4(e)]. We further analyzed the accuracy of these two systems by direct comparison with wound closure rate. The correlation coefficient of TOSD with wound closure rate is 0.58, which is higher than that of LSCI, which is 0.44 [Fig. 4(f)]. 3.4.Increased Expression of Angiogenesis Markers During Proliferative Phase Correlated with Wound Tissue OxygenationTo further assess the significant signal changes detected during the middle phase of wound healing by TOSD, wound fluid discharge was collected and analyzed using an angiogenesis ELISA kit [Fig. 5(a)]. Signature cytokines of the proliferative phase during wound healing, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), and interleukin-1 alpha () exhibited a significant increase in expression on day 6. Conversely, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1), an inflammatory cytokine, showed high expression on day 2 but a significant decline on day 6 [Fig. 5(b)]. Differences in between the open wound and the unwounded skin on days 2, 6, and 12 are illustrated in Fig. 5(c), showing similar trends with the expression of proliferative markers (i.e., GCSF and ). Conversely, the inflammatory marker demonstrated an opposite trend to the change in tissue oxygenation. A high negative correlation coefficient of was found between TIMP-1 and the differences in tissue oxygenation between open wounds and unwounded skin [Fig. 5(d)]. 4.DiscussionIn our study, the TOSD system demonstrated effectiveness in providing a noncontact and convenient method for detecting , validated through the use of multiple imaging modalities. Specifically, three imaging systems were employed to monitor wound conditions in an animal model setting. This methodology allowed us to further demonstrate that the rate of wound closure increases during the proliferative phase, with TOSD and LSCI showing comparable changes in signals throughout the wound healing process. Notably, compared with intact skin, open wounds exhibited significantly higher signals as detected by both TOSD and LSCI. Furthermore, the levels of tissue oxygenation in wounded areas, as detected by TOSD, were found to correlate with the expression levels of angiogenesis markers, which were elevated during the proliferative phase of wound healing. The wound area was quantified using digital photographs on each experimental day, and the corresponding wound closure rates were calculated. During the dynamic process of wound healing, the proliferative phase was observed to exhibit the most rapid wound closure. Previous studies have demonstrated the capability of NIR imaging in assessing wounds.25,26,33 In this study, the TOSD technique showed an advantage in correlating its signals with wound reduction by utilizing NIR technology. Signals captured by TOSD and LSCI were consistent with the trend of wound healing. Moreover, the relationship between and wound closure rate is stronger than that between blood flux and wound closure rate. Specifically, increases in correspond more closely to increases in wound closure rate compared with blood flux detected by LSCI. To further quantify the relationship between wound closure rate and , we performed a linear regression analysis. The normalized regression coefficient () of and wound closure rate is 4.15, indicating that a 1% change in corresponds to change in wound closure rate. The methodologies underlying TOSD and LSCI differ; LSCI operates based on the Doppler effect,6–9,34 whereas TOSD detects by directly irradiating and Hb. LSCI calculates frequency shifts from scattered light upon moving objects, such as the blood, to deduce blood perfusion.35,36 Blood perfusion in the tissues is responsible for the delivery of oxygen and nutrients, as oxygen supply in the tissues is derived from oxygen diffusing through the microcirculation.37 Hence, blood perfusion in the tissue detected by LSCI can be used as an indirect indicator of tissue oxygenation.38 However, due to the variations in blood saturation throughout the body, particularly around wounds where oxygen consumption can be substantial, LSCI may not always provide sufficient information on tissue oxygenation. Another limitation of LSCI is the relatively small penetration depth of speckle images, which is limited to 1 mm.9,39 In contrast, TOSD, with a deeper penetration of to 3 mm,40 is better suited for assessing deeper wounds and can assess more comprehensive . TOSD exploits differences in the optical properties of cutaneous tissues, allowing for the estimation of tissue oxygenation parameters and subsequent calculation of . Our findings demonstrated that wound oxygenation detection using TOSD better aligned with the proliferative phase compared with LSCI. Thus, our research suggests that TOSD offers enhanced capabilities for monitoring wound conditions and identifying the proliferative phase. The proliferative phase represents a pivotal stage in the intricate cascade of events involved in wound healing. Characterized by the development of granulation tissue and the initiation of angiogenesis, this phase heavily relies on the activity of various cytokines, including proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors, which play indispensable roles in facilitating the healing process.3,41–47 Despite the recognized importance of angiogenesis markers in wound healing, previous research has not explored the correlation between these markers and NIR signals in wounds. In our study, biochemical analysis of wound exudate revealed a positive correlation between and proliferative cytokines, such as Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)41,45 and Interleukin 1-alpha ().3,42,46,47 Conversely, a significant negative correlation was observed between and the inflammatory cytokine tissue inhibitor, TIMP-1. These findings underscore the utility of the TOSD technique in discerning the proliferative phase of wound healing. The efficacy of our TOSD system was validated through various methodologies. TOSD, utilizing low-power LEDs, has the potential for miniaturization, making it cost-effective and portable. Among noninvasive approaches, LSCI, HSI, MSI, and ultrasound have been used to assess tissue oxygenation and blood flow in wounds.6,11,48–50 However, LSCI is susceptible to ambient light, which limits its clinical application.10 HIS requires complex calculation processes and high computational power, which hinders widespread adoption and use.13,14 Ultrasound imaging, particularly Doppler ultrasound, can provide information on blood flow velocity and perfusion in superficial and deep tissues.49 However, it has limitations in operator dependence, susceptibility of artifacts, indirect measurement of tissue oxygenation, and the need for coupling gel application, which might affect the wound.51 Compared with these imaging techniques, TOSD offers several advantages. First, TOSD, as an MSI system based on NIR, has a relatively simple imaging technique that can directly measure tissue oxygenation using NIR wavelengths.15–17 Second, TOSD has relatively high resolution52,53 and is less sensitive to ambient light interference compared with LSCI.10 Third, TOSD has a lower cost and requires less computational power compared with HSI, making it more suitable for clinical settings.15 However, TOSD also has some limitations. Due to the limited penetration depth of NIR light, TOSD can only detect in superficial tissues (2- to 3-mm depth).40,49 This limitation may restrict its application in assessing deep tissue oxygenation (e.g., muscle layer). Also, in our current investigation, the precision of TOSD measurements could be further improved to ensure a more reliable assessment of tissue oxygenation. Despite these limitations, TOSD remains a promising technique for the noninvasive assessment of tissue oxygenation in superficial wounds. Its relative simplicity, low cost, potential for miniaturization,16 and direct measurement of make it an attractive option for clinical wound assessment. The miniaturization potential of TOSD enables the development of compact and portable devices that can be easily used in various clinical settings, including remote locations, which is particularly useful for telemedicine applications. We expect TOSD to play a crucial role in aiding clinical decision-making regarding wound conditions and hold potential utility in telemedicine applications. In our work, TOSD was exclusively utilized for monitoring open wounds created on the dorsum of mice. Future preclinical studies should involve experiments on larger animal models to further extend its translational applications. In addition, beyond incisional wounds, it is imperative to explore TOSD’s utility in assessing various types of wounds, such as venous ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, and chronic wounds. Our ongoing research endeavors will focus on leveraging TOSD’s capability to gather critical information for predicting wound healing across diverse wound types. The application of our device extends to evaluating interventions aimed at facilitating wound healing, including novel wound dressings, topical growth factors, negative pressure wound therapy, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy, when integrated into wound management protocols. DisclosuresThe authors declare no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Code and Data AvailabilityThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. AcknowledgmentsThe authors would like to thank Chen-Hsing Lin and Li-Yu Chiou of the National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, and Hsin-Yi Tsai of the Taiwan Instrument Research Institute, National Applied Research Laboratories, Hsinchu, Taiwan, for their assistance with the experimental design. We are also grateful to Sheng-Hsiang Lin and Wan-Ni Chen for providing the statistical consulting services from the Biostatistics Consulting Center, Clinical Medicine Research Center, National Cheng Kung University Hospital. This study was supported in part by grants from the National Science and Technology Council (Grant Nos. 112-2314-B-006-026-MY3 and 112-2622-E-006-008) in Taiwan. ReferencesS. R. Nussbaum et al.,
“An economic evaluation of the impact, cost, and Medicare policy implications of chronic nonhealing wounds,”
Value Health, 21
(1), 27
–32 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007
(2018).
Google Scholar
C. E. Fife, K. A. Eckert and M. J. Carter,
“Publicly reported wound healing rates: the fantasy and the reality,”
Adv. Wound. Care, 7
(3), 77
–94 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2017.0743
(2018).
Google Scholar
A. J. Singer and R. A. Clark,
“Cutaneous wound healing,”
N. Engl. J. Med., 341
(10), 738
–746 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199909023411006 NEJMAG 0028-4793
(1999).
Google Scholar
T. Velnar, T. Bailey and V. Smrkolj,
“The wound healing process: an overview of the cellular and molecular mechanisms,”
J. Int. Med. Res., 37
(5), 1528
–1542 https://doi.org/10.1177/147323000903700531 JGIMEJ 0884-8734
(2009).
Google Scholar
S. Schreml et al.,
“Oxygen in acute and chronic wound healing,”
Br. J. Dermatol., 163
(2), 257
–268 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2010.09804.x BJDEAZ 0007-0963
(2010).
Google Scholar
M. Jayachandran et al.,
“Critical review of noninvasive optical technologies for wound imaging,”
Adv. Wound Care, 5
(8), 349
–359 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2015.0678
(2016).
Google Scholar
A. Couturier et al.,
“Reproducibility of high-resolution laser speckle contrast imaging to assess cutaneous microcirculation for wound healing monitoring in mice,”
Microvasc. Res., 141 104319 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mvr.2022.104319 MIVRA6 0026-2862
(2022).
Google Scholar
C. Wearn et al.,
“Prospective comparative evaluation study of laser Doppler imaging and thermal imaging in the assessment of burn depth,”
Burns, 44
(1), 124
–133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.004 BURND8 0305-4179
(2018).
Google Scholar
T. M. van Vuuren et al.,
“Prediction of venous wound healing with laser speckle imaging,”
Phlebology, 32
(10), 658
–664 https://doi.org/10.1177/0268355517718760 PHLEEF
(2017).
Google Scholar
S. N. Jan et al.,
“Comparison of laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and clinical assessment in differentiating between superficial and deep partial thickness burn wounds,”
Burns, 44
(2), 405
–413 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2017.08.020 BURND8 0305-4179
(2018).
Google Scholar
M.-C. Chang et al.,
“Multimodal sensor system for pressure ulcer wound assessment and care,”
IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., 14
(3), 1186
–1196 https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2782213
(2018).
Google Scholar
Q. Yang et al.,
“Investigation of the performance of hyperspectral imaging by principal component analysis in the prediction of healing of diabetic foot ulcers,”
J. Imaging, 4
(12), https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging4120144
(2018).
Google Scholar
G. Saiko et al.,
“Hyperspectral imaging in wound care: a systematic review,”
Int. Wound J., 17
(6), 1840
–1856 https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13474
(2020).
Google Scholar
A. Schmidt et al.,
“Hyperspectral imaging of wounds reveals augmented tissue oxygenation following cold physical plasma treatment in vivo,”
IEEE Trans. Radiat. Plasma Med. Sci., 5
(3), 412
–419 https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3009913
(2021).
Google Scholar
Y. R. Park, Y. K. Shin and J. B. Eom,
“Non-contact oxygen saturation monitoring for wound healing process using dual-wavelength simultaneous acquisition imaging system,”
Biomed. Eng. Lett., 13
(3), 455
–463 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-023-00275-x
(2023).
Google Scholar
C.-L. Lin et al.,
“Multispectral imaging-based system for detecting tissue oxygen saturation with wound segmentation for monitoring wound healing,”
IEEE J. Transl. Eng. Health Med., 12 468
–479 https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2024.3399232
(2024).
Google Scholar
C. Amendola et al.,
“Robustness of tissue oxygenation estimates by continuous wave space-resolved near infrared spectroscopy,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 28
(7), 075002 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.28.7.075002 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2023).
Google Scholar
F. Lange and I. Tachtsidis,
“Clinical brain monitoring with time domain NIRS: a review and future perspectives,”
Appl. Sci., 9
(8), 1612 https://doi.org/10.3390/app9081612
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Sudakou et al.,
“Time-domain NIRS system based on supercontinuum light source and multi-wavelength detection: validation for tissue oxygenation studies,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 12
(10), 6629
–6650 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.431301 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2021).
Google Scholar
A. Sudakou et al.,
“Two-layered blood-lipid phantom and method to determine absorption and oxygenation employing changes in moments of DTOFs,”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 14
(7), 3506
–3531 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.492168 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2023).
Google Scholar
A. N. Bashkatov et al.,
“Optical properties of human skin, subcutaneous and mucous tissues in the wavelength range from 400 to 2000 nm,”
J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 38
(15), 2543
–2555 https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/38/15/004 JPAPBE 0022-3727
(2005).
Google Scholar
R. Moza, J. M. Dimaio and J. Melendez,
“Deep-tissue dynamic monitoring of decubitus ulcers: wound care and assessment,”
IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag., 29
(2), 71
–77 https://doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2009.935721 IEMBDE 0739-5175
(2010).
Google Scholar
E. S. Papazoglou et al.,
“Near infrared diffuse optical tomography: improving the quality of care in chronic wounds of patients with diabetes,”
Biomed. Instrum. Technol., 41
(1), 83
–87 https://doi.org/10.2345/0899-8205(2007)41[83:NIDOTI]2.0.CO;2 BITYE2 0899-8205
(2007).
Google Scholar
E. S. Papazoglou et al.,
“Optical properties of wounds: diabetic versus healthy tissue,”
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., 53
(6), 1047
–1055 https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2006.873541 IEBEAX 0018-9294
(2006).
Google Scholar
E. S. Papazoglou et al.,
“Monitoring diabetic wound healing by NIR spectroscopy,”
in Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.,
6662
–6664
(2005). https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2005.1616030 Google Scholar
M. S. Weingarten et al.,
“Prediction of wound healing in human diabetic foot ulcers by diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy: a pilot study,”
Wound Repair Regen., 18
(2), 180
–185 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2010.00583.x
(2010).
Google Scholar
M. S. Weingarten et al.,
“Measurement of optical properties to quantify healing of chronic diabetic wounds,”
Wound Repair Regen., 14
(3), 364
–370 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2006.00133.x
(2006).
Google Scholar
M. S. Weingarten et al.,
“Diffuse near-infrared spectroscopy prediction of healing in diabetic foot ulcers: a human study and cost analysis,”
Wound Repair Regen., 20
(6), 911
–917 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00843.x
(2012).
Google Scholar
R. D. Galiano et al.,
“Quantitative and reproducible murine model of excisional wound healing,”
Wound Repair Regen., 12
(4), 485
–492 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1067-1927.2004.12404.x
(2004).
Google Scholar
I. V. Meglinski and S. J. Matcher,
“Quantitative assessment of skin layers absorption and skin reflectance spectra simulation in the visible and near-infrared spectral regions,”
Physiol. Meas., 23
(4), 741
–753 https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/23/4/312 PMEAE3 0967-3334
(2002).
Google Scholar
H.-Y. Tsai et al.,
“A noncontact skin oxygen-saturation imaging system for measuring human tissue oxygen saturation,”
IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., 63
(11), 2620
–2631 https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2014.2312512 IEIMAO 0018-9456
(2014).
Google Scholar
A. K.C. Huong et al.,
“A handheld technology for optical monitoring of transcutaneous blood oxygen saturation,”
Int. J. Eng. Technol., 7
(3), 122
–126 https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.20.18994
(2018).
Google Scholar
R. Kwasinski et al.,
“Tissue oxygenation changes to assess healing in venous leg ulcers using near-infrared optical imaging,”
Adv. Wound Care (New Rochelle), 8
(11), 565
–579 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2018.0880
(2019).
Google Scholar
A. Gonzalez Olmos et al.,
“Optimizing the precision of laser speckle contrast imaging,”
Sci. Rep., 13
(1), 17970 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-45303-z SRCEC3 2045-2322
(2023).
Google Scholar
C. J. Stewart et al.,
“A comparison of two laser-based methods for determination of burn scar perfusion: laser Doppler versus laser speckle imaging,”
Burns, 31
(6), 744
–752 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2005.04.004 BURND8 0305-4179
(2005).
Google Scholar
A. Ponticorvo et al.,
“Quantitative assessment of graded burn wounds in a porcine model using spatial frequency domain imaging (SFDI) and laser speckle imaging (LSI),”
Biomed. Opt. Express, 5
(10), 3467
–3481 https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.5.003467 BOEICL 2156-7085
(2014).
Google Scholar
C. J. Munoz et al.,
“A review on microvascular hemodynamics: the control of blood flow distribution and tissue oxygenation,”
Crit. Care Clin., 36
(2), 293
–305 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2019.12.011 CCCLEH 0749-0704
(2020).
Google Scholar
I. G. Gould et al.,
“The capillary bed offers the largest hemodynamic resistance to the cortical blood supply,”
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 37
(1), 52
–68 https://doi.org/10.1177/0271678X16671146
(2017).
Google Scholar
A. K. Dunn et al.,
“Dynamic imaging of cerebral blood flow using laser speckle,”
J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab., 21
(3), 195
–201 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004647-200103000-00002
(2001).
Google Scholar
T. Binzoni et al.,
“Detection limits of multi-spectral optical imaging under the skin surface,”
Phys. Med. Biol., 53
(3), 617
–636 https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/3/008 PHMBA7 0031-9155
(2008).
Google Scholar
S. Barrientos et al.,
“Growth factors and cytokines in wound healing,”
Wound Repair Regen., 16
(5), 585
–601 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-475X.2008.00410.x
(2008).
Google Scholar
E. Fahey and S. L. Doyle,
“IL-1 family cytokine regulation of vascular permeability and angiogenesis,”
Front. Immunol., 10 1426 https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.01426
(2019).
Google Scholar
P. A. Hebda et al.,
“Basic fibroblast growth factor stimulation of epidermal wound healing in pigs,”
J. Invest. Dermatol., 95
(6), 626
–631 https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12513528 JIDEAE 0022-202X
(1990).
Google Scholar
G. Hübner et al.,
“Differential regulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines during wound healing in normal and glucocorticoid-treated mice,”
Cytokine, 8
(7), 548
–556 https://doi.org/10.1006/cyto.1996.0074 CYTIE9 1043-4666
(1996).
Google Scholar
A. Yönem et al.,
“Effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in the treatment of diabetic foot infection,”
Diabetes Obes. Metab., 3
(5), 332
–337 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1463-1326.2001.00142.x
(2001).
Google Scholar
A. Tang and B. A. Gilchrest,
“Regulation of keratinocyte growth factor gene expression in human skin fibroblasts,”
J. Dermatol. Sci., 11
(1), 41
–50 https://doi.org/10.1016/0923-1811(95)00418-1 JDSCEI 0923-1811
(1996).
Google Scholar
B. A. Mast and G. S. Schultz,
“Interactions of cytokines, growth factors, and proteases in acute and chronic wounds,”
Wound Repair Regen., 4
(4), 411
–420 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1524-475X.1996.40404.x
(1996).
Google Scholar
D. W. Paul et al.,
“Noninvasive imaging technologies for cutaneous wound assessment: a review,”
Wound Repair Regen., 23
(2), 149
–162 https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12262
(2015).
Google Scholar
C. K. Sen et al.,
“Cutaneous imaging technologies in acute burn and chronic wound care,”
Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 138
(3 Suppl.), 119s
–128s https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000002654
(2016).
Google Scholar
S. Li et al.,
“Imaging in chronic wound diagnostics,”
Adv. Wound Care, 9
(5), 245
–263 https://doi.org/10.1089/wound.2019.0967
(2020).
Google Scholar
S. S. Shelar et al.,
“A comprehensive review of sonographic assessment of peripheral slow-flow vascular malformations,”
Cureus, 16
(2), e54099 https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54099
(2024).
Google Scholar
E. Aloupogianni et al.,
“Hyperspectral and multispectral image processing for gross-level tumor detection in skin lesions: a systematic review,”
J. Biomed. Opt., 27
(6), https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO.27.6.060901 JBOPFO 1083-3668
(2022).
Google Scholar
D. Mengu et al.,
“Snapshot multispectral imaging using a diffractive optical network,”
Light Sci. Appl., 12
(1), 86 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-023-01135-0
(2023).
Google Scholar
BiographyYi-Syuan Shin, MD, is a junior plastic surgeon at the National Cheng Kung University (NCKU) Hospital in Taiwan. She is currently pursuing a PhD focused on utilizing artificial intelligence for automated wound area recognition and wound healing status assessment. Her research interests include wound healing and tissue regeneration. Kuo-Shu Hung, MSc, MD, is an experienced plastic surgeon at the NCKU Hospital in Taiwan. He has a keen interest in wound healing and the mechanisms underlying keloid and hypertrophic scar formation. Chung-Te Tsai is a fourth-year medical student at NCKU, with a double major in electrical engineering. He has been conducting research under the supervision of Yuan-Yu Hsueh, MD, PhD, since his freshman year. Meng-Hsuan Wu is a PhD candidate in the Department of Electrical Engineering at NCKU. His interests focus on multispectral imaging systems and wound healing prediction. Chih-Lung Lin, PhD, is the section chief and a distinguished professor in the Department of Electrical Engineering, NCKU. He is also a senior member of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, leading a multidisciplinary team of researchers on developing mini-LED, microLED mini-LED, and microLED pixel circuit designs, as well as a multispectral imaging-based tissue oxygenation imaging system. Yuan-Yu Hsueh, MD, PhD, is the principal investigator and physician at NCKU. He is a confirmed faculty member of the International Plastic Surgery Research Council. His research expertise focuses on peripheral nerve regeneration, wound healing, tissue regeneration, pathophysiology, and therapeutic targets of keloid and hypertrophic scar. |
Wound healing
Tissues
Laser speckle contrast imaging
Oxygenation
Oxygen
Skin
Multispectral imaging