Guest editors Nathan Youngblood, Qian Wang, Robert E. Simpson, and Juejun Hu introduce the Special Section on Phase-Change Reconfigurable Photonics. |
Phase change materials (PCMs), compounds that exhibit large optical property contrast upon a structural phase transition, have been widely hailed as one of the most promising routes to realizing reconfigurable photonic devices and circuits.1,2 Compared to traditional optical tuning mechanisms, such as electrooptic and thermo-optic modulation, PCM-enabled reconfigurable photonics feature the advantages of ultra-compact footprint and low energy consumption, and have already found broad applications in computing, communications, imaging and sensing. This special section highlights several recent advances in this exciting area. Benefitting from its small thermal mass and out-of-plane thermal resistance, graphene has been recognized as a high-performance resistive heater material for thermal switching of PCMs.3,4 Liu et al.5 reported multi-level switching of , a low-loss PCM,6 using graphene micro-heaters. The device’s optical response could be switched for more than 30,000 cycles, which represents a major cycle endurance improvement over the prior state-of-the-art. Waveguide phase shifters and interferometer optical switches were further experimentally implemented based on this platform. Khoi et al.7 proposed a PCM photonic switch similarly based on and graphene heaters, and showed through simulations that its switching energy can be as low as 21 nJ. Pan et al.8 explored an optical metasurface design using to realize a tunable waveplate. The metasurface switched from a half waveplate to a quarter waveplate following the amorphous to crystalline transition of . Remarkably, the design maintains consistent performance across a wide range of rotation angles. Sharma et al.9 investigated liquid-phase solution deposition of films and the resulting film properties. Compared to vapor phase deposition methods, which are commonly used to form PCM films, their reported solution processing technique offers a versatile and scalable alternative to prepare PCM films. Instead of using low-loss PCMs such as 10 and ,6 Chen et al.11 proposed a novel design containing multiple individually controlled phase shifter segments to overcome losses resulting from the technologically mature (albeit optically absorbing) PCM, (GST). According to their modeling, the design can yield a low insertion loss just 1.2 dB in a multi-level switch configuration. Shafiee et al.12 performed a systematic analysis of photonic memory designs based on Si and SiN waveguides co-integrated with PCMs including GST and (GSST).13 Their multi-physics simulation models indicate that, compared to silicon nitride waveguides, employing silicon waveguides coupled with PCMs can result in a more reliable solution with lower optical scattering loss and enhanced bit density per cell. In their paper, Hu et al.14 designed a multilayer thin film device incorporating the electrochromic ionic conductor . By leveraging a Fabry-Pérot optical stack design, a solid-state electrochromic device with high color brightness and saturation was demonstrated. We thank the authors for contributing to this special section, which covers a diverse cross-section of topics related to reconfigurable photonics based on phase change materials. We hope that this special section will help spur further interest and investigations in this dynamic field. ReferencesM. Wuttig, H. Bhaskaran and T. Taubner,
“Phase-change materials for non-volatile photonic applications,”
Nat. Photonics, 11
(8), 465
–476 https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2017.126 NPAHBY 1749-4885
(2017).
Google Scholar
P. Prabhathan et al.,
“Roadmap for phase change materials in photonics and beyond,”
iScience, 26
(10), 107946 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2023.107946
(2023).
Google Scholar
C. Ríos et al.,
“Multi‐level electro‐thermal switching of optical phase‐change materials using graphene,”
Adv. Photonics Res., 2
(1), 2000034 https://doi.org/10.1002/adpr.202000034
(2020).
Google Scholar
Z. Fang et al.,
“Ultra-low-energy programmable non-volatile silicon photonics based on phase-change materials with graphene heaters,”
Nat. Nanotechnol., 17
(8), 842
–848 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-022-01153-w NNAABX 1748-3387
(2022).
Google Scholar
S. Liu et al.,
“Phase-change material enabled silicon phase shifter actuated by a highly durable graphene microheater,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031207 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031207
(2024).
Google Scholar
M. Delaney et al.,
“A new family of ultralow loss reversible phase-change materials for photonic integrated circuits: Sb2S3 and Sb2Se3,”
Adv. Funct. Mater., 30
(36), 2002447 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202002447 AFMDC6 1616-301X
(2020).
Google Scholar
K. P. Dao, J. Hu and R. Soref,
“Design of an ultra-compact, energy-efficient non-volatile photonic switch based on phase change materials,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031204 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031204
(2024).
Google Scholar
X. Pan et al.,
“Hybrid all-dielectric phase-change metasurfaces for tunable waveplate,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031206 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031206
(2024).
Google Scholar
R. Sharma et al.,
“Solution-based Sb2Se3 thin films for microphotonics,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031203 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031203
(2024).
Google Scholar
W. Dong et al.,
“Wide bandgap phase change material tuned visible photonics,”
Adv. Funct. Mater., 29
(6), 1806181 https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806181 AFMDC6 1616-301X
(2019).
Google Scholar
R. Chen et al.,
“Low-loss multilevel operation using lossy phase-change material-integrated silicon photonics,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031202 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031202
(2024).
Google Scholar
A. Shafiee et al.,
“Programmable phase change materials and silicon photonics cointegration for photonic memory applications: a systematic study,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031208 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031208
(2024).
Google Scholar
Y. Zhang et al.,
“Broadband transparent optical phase change materials for high-performance nonvolatile photonics,”
Nat. Commun., 10 4279 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12196-4 NCAOBW 2041-1723
(2019).
Google Scholar
J. Hu et al.,
“Combining Bragg reflector and Fabry–Pérot cavity into a solid-state electrochromic device for dynamic modulation,”
J. Opt. Microsyst., 4
(3), 031205 https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JOM.4.3.031205
(2024).
Google Scholar
|