28 September 2023 Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm
Joshua Follansbee, Derek Burrell, Orges Furxhi, C. Kyle Renshaw, John Lund, Ronald Driggers
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Active imaging systems can provide increased contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and targeting performance over passive systems in low-light and long-range applications. We use both a radiometric model and the Night Vision Integrated Performance Model to compare the performance of active continuous-wave (CW) and laser range-gated (LRG) imaging systems with laser illumination at 1.6 and 2.1 μm, corresponding to the shortwave infrared (SWIR) and extended SWIR (eSWIR) bands, respectively. The imager performance is characterized by CNR as a function of range, as well as pixels-on-target. The modeling results demonstrate increased performance in the eSWIR band over the SWIR band in the majority of cases and increased performance for LRG systems over CW systems in all cases. The in-progress design of an active imaging testbed to confirm these modeling results with field imagery is discussed.

© 2023 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE)
Joshua Follansbee, Derek Burrell, Orges Furxhi, C. Kyle Renshaw, John Lund, and Ronald Driggers "Target acquisition performance comparison of active continuous-wave and range-gated imaging systems at 1.6 and 2.1 μm," Optical Engineering 62(9), 094107 (28 September 2023). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.62.9.094107
Received: 26 June 2023; Accepted: 18 September 2023; Published: 28 September 2023
Lens.org Logo
CITATIONS
Cited by 1 scholarly publication.
Advertisement
Advertisement
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
Get copyright permission  Get copyright permission on Copyright Marketplace
KEYWORDS
Short wave infrared radiation

Imaging systems

Reflectivity

Systems modeling

Performance modeling

Sensors

Active imaging

Back to Top