The performance of differential synthetic aperture ladar (DSAL) processing versus phase-gradient autofocus (PGA) technique in SAL image formation is demonstrated experimentally using phase history data (PHD) with large random phase errors and various target returns generated from a laboratory DSAL setup operating at 1550-nm wavelength. Results show that at strong return levels, both DSAL and PGA are very robust in focusing high-resolution images from the PHD; whereas, as target returns become weak and PHD is dominated by noise, the iterative PGA performs less effectively than the DSAL does. It is concluded that, on the whole, the DSAL technique is possibly more robust than PGA in both effectiveness and efficiencies.
Access to the requested content is limited to institutions that have purchased or subscribe to SPIE eBooks.
You are receiving this notice because your organization may not have SPIE eBooks access.*
*Shibboleth/Open Athens users─please
sign in
to access your institution's subscriptions.
To obtain this item, you may purchase the complete book in print or electronic format on
SPIE.org.
INSTITUTIONAL Select your institution to access the SPIE Digital Library.
PERSONAL Sign in with your SPIE account to access your personal subscriptions or to use specific features such as save to my library, sign up for alerts, save searches, etc.